Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adiaireton8

I have experience with both.

The particulate filters are a maintenance nightmare.

Low sulfur diesel does reduce emissions, but it is more expensive. Also, the lubricity ('slipperyness') of ULSD (Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel) is poor, which can lead to component failure in the fuel injection system.
Strangely enough, adding 5% Biodiesel to ULSD further reduces emissions, restores the lubricity, and reduces petroleum consumption by 5%.
B5 (5% Biodiesel) performs well in winter compared to richer Biodiesel blends, which can "gel" at higher temperatures than regular diesel.


80 posted on 12/05/2005 4:45:58 PM PST by Ostlandr (Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer do NOT represent me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Ostlandr
Apparently, you have not experienced the maintenance-free kind. Here's an example.

Mercedes diesels now have maintenance-free particulate filters on over 40 models.

I use B100 year-round, except Dec-Jan, when I go to 10-20% kerosene.

-A8

83 posted on 12/05/2005 5:13:30 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson