Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paulat

Sounds like a design problem.
You mention that these are faster than the old buses on hills and the highway.
This would indicate that these buses are optimized for improved performance with the same horsepower and fuel economy. Specify a smaller engine next time, and performance will drop to the level of the old buses, but fuel economy will increase.
Some of the new hybrid SUVs are being designed that way on purpose- to get more performance for the same fuel usage.
If you spec an engine large enough to maintain highway speeds on steep grades, then you have too much engine to really get the best advantage of the hybrid system. In fact, due to the added weight of the hybrid system, the vehicles will most likely get worse mileage running up and down hills at highway speeds.
And you noted that the maintenance savings are $3 million per year. That buys a LOT of diesel.


78 posted on 12/05/2005 4:38:15 PM PST by Ostlandr (Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer do NOT represent me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Ostlandr
And you noted that the maintenance savings are $3 million per year. That buys a LOT of diesel.

$44 million ($47 million - $3 million maintenance) buys a heck of a lot more....

81 posted on 12/05/2005 4:48:32 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson