Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ncountylee
Well, let's see:
- The left wants to stop the war on terrorism.
- The left doesn't want captured terrorists to be interrogated.
- The borders are still wide open.
- AND NOBODY WILL EVEN TALK ABOUT ABLE DANGER!

From everything I saw, the 9/11 commission's main objective was to protect Klintoon and his cronies. It was possibly the most partisan commission ever created and it never even addressed the real issue, which is that:

Islamofascism is the greatest threat to world peace in our time! At the height of the Cold War, the Soviet Union wasn't nearly as grave a threat as the jihadists, because they were at least rational enough to communicate with us. We know where the terrorists came from, we know what they look like and we know what they believe. If there has ever been a case for "profiling" in the history of mankind, this is it.

12 posted on 12/04/2005 3:43:54 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
rational enough to communicate with us

Furthermore the doctrine of mutually assured destruction requires that you be able clearly to identify the source of a strategic first strike. This was easy when we and the Soviets were the only one's on the planet with that capability. Proxy wars popped up all over the place, police actions, low intensity conflicts, and the occasional outright invasion in places where both sides could fight it out without risk of triggering a strategic response.

The confluence of proliferation and terrorism threw that equation totally out of balance. Everyone seemed to understand that "the world changed on 9/11" but now they don't seem to grasp what exactly it is that changed.

The bad guys are doing everything in their power to develop stealth first strike capability. A strike with no clear origin but with a devastating impact. This is the published strategy of the Jihadi's. As much as people like to beat their chests and say 'we will nuke Mecca' or 'we will turn Iran to glass', the Jihadi's know that it's just not that simple. Even under the gravest of circumstances it is unlikely that we or our allies will indiscriminately murder millions of people. It wouldn't stop the terrorists even if we did.

The world did, indeed, change on 9/11 but we have gone back to sleep. The rules we lived by in the past, such as not attacking unless there was an imminent threat, or placing the civil rights of non-citizens ahead of national security (not profiling people), have now become suicidal. They just won't work any longer.

There were two things that kept the Soviets from coming after us directly. There would be no way to hide the origin of the attack and their communist system lacked the economic power to win the global resources race and thereby starve away our ability to respond. (Note that Ronnie Reagan finally pushed them over the edge by out spending them and not by nuking their cities) The Jihadi's have adopted a strategy that bypasses both of those problems but ONLY if we sit back and wait for them to come to us. We have no choice but to go after them aggressively both at home and abroad.

Another rant. Sometimes I just can't stop myself.

22 posted on 12/04/2005 4:28:11 PM PST by cdrw (Freedom and responsibility are inseparable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson