[calcowgirl]

I would support "unity of priniciple" if those principles do not deviate from the platform of the party in which the candidate chooses to belong. Things like the right to bear arms, private property rights, limited government, etc. When a candidate does not embrace these principles, do you still expect "unity"?

Unfortunately, as some have abandoned principle, looking only for a candidate that can "win," the CA GOP seems to have revised their platform leftward. For example, their new statement on illegal immigration makes it sound like "if the feds pay, all are welcome."

http://www.cagop.org/

[Amerigomag]

For example, their new statement on illegal immigration makes it sound like "if the feds pay, all are welcome.

Got a more specific URL? Thanks.

[b9]

I would support "unity of priniciple"...

It's always telling when the spelling is off.

[staytrue]

I would support "unity of priniciple"

I think you only support unity if they are your principles and no one elses