Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amerigomag; ElkGroveDan; GVgirl; Carry_Okie; FOG724; calcowgirl; FairOpinion; DoughtyOne; ...
What do you mean, "no published evidence of that fact?" Weren't you on those threads back in February in response to the CAGOP convention as it was happening?

You are right! There will be a primary and both Gerald Parsky and Darrel Issa threw their hats into the ring at the February convention... But the dumb delegates got stampeded into swooning for Schwartzie Baby and voted for a one time rule change allowing them to then vote to prematurely endorse him for Governor way back then!!!

So virtually there might at well not be any Primary, which is why many of us have been saying there is no Primary!!! (somebody correct me if I'm mistaken, or wrong, please)

Now... Since I believe the above to be true and largely correct... And since Arnroid essentially hijacked a Recall that Darrel Issa had invested a million of his own fortune to help the grassroots conservatives that got the whole thing started... I think it would be justice if Issa would be paid back by being given the Primary nod by Republicans in '06, just to pay him back and to pay Arnroid back for this flagrant mis-appointment that is way worse than the Harriet what's-her-name SCOTUS appointment!!!

54 posted on 12/03/2005 1:59:27 PM PST by SierraWasp (The only thing that can save CA is making eastern CA the 51st state called Sierra Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: SierraWasp
Thanks for the information.

As I indicated, although you and others have vehemently indicated there will be, practically speaking, no Republican primary on June 6, 2006, it appears that McPherson will accept the 150 signatures in lieu of filing fees up to Feb 23 and Declarations/Nomination Papers plus the $3500 filling fee for gubernatorial candidates registered in the Republican Party. McPherson's site contains no disclaimers that Republicans need not apply.

Again, please correct me if I'm wrong.

56 posted on 12/03/2005 2:22:38 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
I share your outrage over the endorsement Wasp, but it's just a statement. It's mostly meaningless, it can be retracted (which would be a bigger statement than the original endorsement) and anyone who wants to run still can before the filing deadline.

The Executive board of the CRP are already making noise about moving to pull the endorsement. The next week or so is going to make all the difference in the world. Either the outrage continues to grow over this slap in the face or everyone quietly grumbles away and accepts it. It's too close to call at this point.
57 posted on 12/03/2005 2:31:38 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
both Gerald Parsky and Darrel Issa threw their hats into the ring at the February convention... But the dumb delegates got stampeded into swooning for Schwartzie Baby and voted for a one time rule change allowing them to then vote to prematurely endorse him for Governor way back then!!!

Why do you keep saying this, when it didn't happen?

78 posted on 12/03/2005 3:57:32 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson