When ID does something to increase the sum of human knowledge, they can put it in science class
Questioning has never been wrong if done fairly. This is what increases knowledge and our lot, not the Darwin theory itself as a sort of algorithm, but the questioning itself is the main "algorithm of the algorithms".
By the way, this is one of the worst articles ever in support of Darwinism. It's all about avoiding and forbiding the questions and debates around Darwinism and entitling a theory. It's about control of curriculum and making a fuss about ID when there is so much lies, distortions and stupid unscientific radical political cult teachers and curriculae out there.
A theory is not scientific if it is entitled. I defeats the purpose of science itself which for its own improvement cannot rely on entitlements. It's ridiculous that the AMA uses its sheer entitlement power and not reason to make their point. The most UNSCIENTIFIC screed ever and thus worst advocacy of Darwinism I have seen yet.
Questioning has never been wrong if done fairly. This is what increases knowledge and our lot, not the Darwin theory itself as a sort of algorithm, but the questioning itself is the main "algorithm of the algorithms". If you were right, all the slow learners in class, the ones who just couldn't absorb the material, would be up for Nobel Prizes. That's ID. Asking the same questions over and over for at least the last 10 years and ignoring the answers.
By the way, this is one of the worst articles ever in support of Darwinism.
Truman used to say he didn't give 'em hell; he gave 'em the truth and they thought it was hell.