Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle

Yes, a chimp is a closer evolutionary relative so it stood a better chance of succeeding.

Others knew the risks and informed the patients.

This was an unnecessary risk taken by a willfully ignorant individual.

You can go on as much as you like about ego, but the doctor's clear statement was that the used a baboon because he didn't believe in evolution.


142 posted on 12/03/2005 1:16:01 PM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: From many - one.

That's OK,-I stopped arguing with Democrats when I quit Compuserve. Carry on with your recruiting--watching with interst.


143 posted on 12/03/2005 1:17:53 PM PST by Mamzelle (evogracious#6--you unbelievably ignorant clown!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: From many - one.
You can go on as much as you like about ego, but the doctor's clear statement was that the used a baboon because he didn't believe in evolution.

Then he would still have been a fool even if we had never heard of Darwin. He was ignoring Linnaeus.

165 posted on 12/03/2005 1:52:07 PM PST by Alain Chartier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson