Posted on 12/02/2005 10:15:22 PM PST by Hunden
And of course, to say that Dubrovnik was originally "Serb" on account of the fact that it was founded on a territory invaded by the Serbs in the 7th century is only slightly less true than to say that the Ustashe were Serbs. For almost all of the Ustashe were Herzegovinian Croats and as such, the descendants of Serbs converted to Catholicism by the Franciscans in the early 15th century.
Branka Magas bases her reasoning on the 1974 Constitution, which recognized the "equal rights" of the Constituent peoples" and "nationalities".
No, you're thinking of the nation of cowards that is France where peace will only come when the territorial claims of the descendents of the Franks, meaning the cheese-eating surrender monkeys, are at long last rejected by their new Muhammedan occupants.
Peace in Kosovo, on the other hand, will only come alongside the Serb army, who will also restore justice.
— The Muslims in the former Yugoslavia are invaders, not native people whose ancestors converted to a mild form of islam.
— None of them is anything but an Islamo-fascist so that every violence meted out to them is legitimate self-defence
— Those who defend their rights as innocent human beings are therefore accomplices of Islamo-fascism or in the pay of liberal do-gooders.
— There is no objective truth: every statement by the member of a tribe is due to the fact that he or she is a member of that tribe. What my tribe says is true because it is my tribe, and therefore…
— Every territorial claims by the Serbs is legitimate, including countries which were never part of a Serbian state or where the Serbs are only a tiny minority.
Beyond those statements, every one of which is the opposite of the truth, you have nothing to say.
Why repeat yourself?
The political principle at the root of Western, and particularly American, civilization is that every human being naturally has rights to the extent that he does not violate the rights of others.
You are not part of that civilization: the principle which drives you here, that you may say anything you wish and do everything you want to others if you claim to have the right religion, that is if you belong to the right tribe, is the Oriental principle at the core of Islamo-fascistm.
That is why you cannot be an ally, but are actually a hindrance in the struggle against it, and your claim to defend "Christianity" is an embarrassment to all real Christians
Considering that you made each one of them up, monkey-boy, what makes you think you can make me claim any of them since they are not what I said?
Shouldn't you be surrendering to someone by now?
If you didn't agree with some those statements, all you had to to is indicate which ones.
Actually, I didn't have to do anything of the sort. Like seeing dog crap in the road, there's just no reason to get involved with it.
All of the statements were nonsense and the suggestion that any of our anti-Islamofascist posters said anything of the sort is pure dog crap.
Surrender now, monkey, and fulfill your destiny!
Actually, their ancestors were native people that converted to a very brutal form of Islam! Unless, of course, you consider having your children ripped from you and sent to Turkey as "mild"!
You really should educate yourself about the brutality of Islam in the Balkans.
And after that Spain, wasn't it, from a post here quite some time ago, also used to be part of a muslim nation...
What we really need is that muslim expansionist map that used to be posted here rather frequently. So we can see if there are any countries not targeted for the return that we can possibly inhabit. Hopefully we can all squeeze in to those few places that still exist that were not originally muslim.
And I guess I can forget visiting Georgia again, because certainly the entire Caucasus was originally a very ancient chechen/muslim nation.
In a few years we will be able to learn about how the US was actually a muslim nation at one time.
There are no "equal rights" here. Mrs. Branka Magas has obviously no clue what she's talking about. The right to self-determination was granted to the constituent nations only.
Kosova and Voivodina were actually established before Serbia: Kosova in January 1944, Voivodina in March 1944, Serbia only in November 1944.
What a load of crap. Serbia was established in 1878 at the 'Congress of Berlin'.
‘Why do Western governments assume that the wishes of Republic of Srpska’s inhabitants are insufficient grounds for recognizing its independence, and that such a step requires also Sarajevo’s acquiescence?’
The Western assumption that Muslim Bosnia enjoys sovereign rights over Republic of Srpska, however, is as fictitious as the Western myth that democratic, civilized society based on human rights and rule of law can exist.”
Now that is more like it.
Most of Christian Albanians live outside of Kosovo in Albanian proper and yes in USA. They are much more civilized, law abiding and peaceful.
Yes, the very same constitution that made the break-up of Yugoslavia inevitable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.