To: Sam the Sham; Cicero
Agreed-it will be either Warner or Bayh. They need a Bush State. If Allen is our nominee (which I think he will be) it will be Bayh since Allen would beat Warner in Va. Hillary being the nominee would be the best thing that could happen to us. We could run a stick figure and win.
Richardson as VP will be problems as it puts the SW into play.
45 posted on
12/02/2005 6:35:32 PM PST by
MattinNJ
(Allen/Pawlenty in 08-play the map.)
To: MattinNJ
Could Allen beat Warner in VA ? I wonder.
The interesting thing about the 2004 Dem primaries was that white leftists took control of the nominating process from black politicians. There was no establishment figure for the black politicians to get behind. Kerry came out of left field after Dean imploded.
49 posted on
12/02/2005 6:38:21 PM PST by
Sam the Sham
(A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
To: MattinNJ
I had a prominent 'Rat elected official in Michigan tell me personally if Bayh gets the nod, it will cause a split in the party. A huge number of activists will NEVER support Mark Warner or Evan Bayh. The base is moving towards Feingold (if only because they view Hillary as being damaged goods and ideologically unreliable (!) and Kerry as unelectable).
55 posted on
12/02/2005 6:44:35 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson