Posted on 12/02/2005 4:03:11 PM PST by JustAnotherOkie
A security researcher in Israel has found a way to steal information from unwitting users of Google's desktop search tool by exploiting an unpatched flaw in Microsoft's ubiquitous Internet Explorer.
There is a bug in the way the Web browser processes CSS rules, Matan Gillon wrote in a description of his hack posted on Wednesday. CSS, or Cascading Style Sheets, is a method for setting common styles across multiple Web pages. The Web design technique is widely used on many sites across the Internet.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.zdnet.com ...
I'd say 99.99% IE and the remainder google.
FIREFOX
FIREFOX
I've been using Firefox for a while now. It crashes often on all three computers that I have it on. Opera (got free during their anniversary promotional) works well without crashing.
Yeah I agree. I just downloaded the new 1.5 version of Firefox and it just keeps getting better and better.
What's IE??
Your Firefox crashes on multiple machines are interesting phenomena. I can't figure how you have yours set up so that all three crash. I've never had any crash problems on any machine except, for a very short time, when Adobe Acrobat opened. That problem was solved very quickly. I've tried Opera 3-4 times. It's just odd, IMO.
It seems from the article that using Google is arbitrary, that the flaw could be used to exploit other software as well.
Also, Google will probably have their part of it patched long before IE.
As far as the end user, of course it's their responsibility, ultimately. They shouldn't be using a browser so volatile you can actually hear it ticking.
The liability in these recurring episodes lies strictly with the consumer. There are many alternatives available to consumers to surf the web with relative security. These alternatives are cheaper than MS's solutions and within the technical skill range of most consumers.
Compounding the inherent laziness quotient is ignorance. Ignorance, not stupidity. Two simple rules eliminate most of the threat posed by malware:
1) Don't go where you don't know. Leave the pioneering to pioneers. Surf where it's safe.
2) Treat all personal electronic communication as a potential threat. Handle email and instant messaging with the respect you accord an unloaded firearm. If the magazine is empty, check the chamber before you examine the muzzle.
http://explorerdestroyer.com/
http://www.killbillsbrowser.com/
Don't venture over to /.. They'll eat your lunch while you're occupied promoting an OS solution.
Have you seen that?
Well, I'm more libertarian than conservative in some ways. You could call me a Radically Strict Constructionist. :-). I think I've been a Freeper longer than I've been a /.er though. There's a lot more of us RSC's out there than you might think.
To some of us older geeks, ctrl-+ is more important than tabs!
As a long time IT consumer I'm encouraged by the progress made in the OS community over the past ten years.
Like many I started with MS. Unlike many I went from DOS to NT4 as a consumer. Today I still value the utility of Redmond's products but only in a safe environment ... away from the internet. I venture onto WANs protected by the relative obscurity of the children of UNIX. Opera or Mozilla ported to Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris or OX10 presents a diminishing return, not worth chasing, for most malware authors.
My youngest son, a web administrator in the UC system, cringes because I've recently taken to recommending Linspire 5.0 plus Firefox as an easy first step toward safer surfing for MS users tired of the Tuesday morning panic from Redmond. He calls me a sell out because Robertson's business plan is a copy of Gate's scheme.
Yup
Anyone who says that now obviously hasn't a clue what they are talking about. They probably don't know an OS from a API.
It's a big corporation sure but pre windows was all about drivers, interrupts, extended and expanded memory ect... Without MS there would not be universal internet access because hackers would be trashing every machine on the net. Either that or we would be running UNIX with a character based UI.
And these computers are a huge mix of brands (a lot of cheapies) purchased by the company over the last four years.
Makes me wonder what you are using.
With my eyesight being what it is, I can no longer do without the CTL + to increas text size to meet my needs.
I've not had a problem with Firefox crashing. Have on older machine and one newer one.
I just notice that AdAware and SpyBot don't find many things anymore. If I run IE a little, then AdAware and Spybot find lots of goodies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.