Am I the only one that views this statement as an apology of not being able to supply the demand? Who is she sending a signal to that the commodity of Mexican labor will encounter a short fall?
If this isn't proof of collusion between elements of our government and Mexico for open borders, then what is?
That's what I thought at first, but read it again.
"We predict that we will not be able to sustain the growth in migration," because of a drop in birth rates here, she said.Perhaps she is just mourning the potential loss of revenue for Mexico. After all, the fewer migrants there are up here, the less money (remittances) there is being sent back to Mexico.
(What do you think?)