To: wagglebee
This is the psycho who believes parents should retain the right to kill their children up to one year after birth, should they decide they don't want the child.
He is also an advocate for human/animal sex.
I did not make the previous stuff up.
7 posted on
12/02/2005 2:45:57 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
I respect Singer for his clarity of thought and refusal to obfuscate the logical conclusions of his utilitarian thought. What I find scary is that his radical conclusions draw almost no notice and no controversy outside prolife activist circles. No wonder he thinks his opposition will collapse in a few years.
35 posted on
12/02/2005 3:14:53 PM PST by
colorado tanker
(I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
To: dead
If he is a utilitarian, why is he not dead by his own hand?
Who the hell needs a bioethicist?
37 posted on
12/02/2005 3:15:47 PM PST by
AmishDude
(Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
To: dead
This is the psycho who believes parents should retain the right to kill their children up to one year after birth, should they decide they don't want the child. The man is a psychotic, but then again the Romans did much the same thing with their children as well.
Not defending it at all, just pointing out who else did it.
44 posted on
12/02/2005 3:30:21 PM PST by
Centurion2000
((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson