Skip to comments.
Princeton Bioethicist says only Know-Nothing Religious Fundamentalists will Value Human Life by 2040
LifeSiteNews ^
| 12/2/05
| Hilary White
Posted on 12/02/2005 2:41:36 PM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: Doctor Don
"In 1940 I will be 77 years old"......you are 142 years old now........tell us your secret! Must be all that clean living and FReepin!
41
posted on
12/02/2005 3:23:03 PM PST
by
gridlock
(eliminate perverse incentives)
To: wagglebee
I wonder if he already has a recipe for Soylent Green.
"Soylent Green, Now with more people!"
42
posted on
12/02/2005 3:27:01 PM PST
by
El Sordo
To: wagglebee
I have a strong belief that Singer, when on his death bed, will suddenly be begging for God's forgiveness.
Why? Anyone so arrogant and certain as him is trying to hide his guilt.
43
posted on
12/02/2005 3:29:34 PM PST
by
Edit35
To: dead
This is the psycho who believes parents should retain the right to kill their children up to one year after birth, should they decide they don't want the child. The man is a psychotic, but then again the Romans did much the same thing with their children as well.
Not defending it at all, just pointing out who else did it.
44
posted on
12/02/2005 3:30:21 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
To: RegulatorCountry
"...about 10% of college undergrads...25% of grad students...more than half of Political Science, Philosophy and Anthropology majors. There's an odd, disassociative effect going on, because these aforementioned individuals never seem to grasp that their own "utility" can be made suspect quite easily.Thats a good observation.
They are teaching the young adults now, that will be making the choices for them later. Old, tenured codgers just repeat themselves and have little prospect of generating additional knowledge in the future. hmmmmmmmm
45
posted on
12/02/2005 3:47:47 PM PST
by
Lester Moore
(The headwaters of the islamic river of death and hate are in Saudi Arabia.)
To: firebrand; Coleus
ping
46
posted on
12/02/2005 3:50:42 PM PST
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: wagglebee
Technology has been developing since the emergence of organized human culture. In all that time, however, it is not until our own epoch that the suicidal anti-human philosophy has been so broadly accepted. In no other time before the modern age, has it been seriously proposed that the development of technology must necessarily supercede the inherent value of human life. Click on this:
To: wagglebee
Singer is just another half-wit trying to shock his way into fame.
48
posted on
12/02/2005 3:53:48 PM PST
by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: wagglebee
I guess I'll have to side with the "know-nothing religious fundamentalists", then.
To: wagglebee
Utilitarianism? Oh. And "he's the greatest philosopher in modern times?"
Utilitarianism was discredited in the 19th century.
50
posted on
12/02/2005 4:47:41 PM PST
by
Reactionary
(Liberals are the Lunatic Fringe of the Lunatic Fringe)
To: wagglebee
He is truly disgusting, but correct (apart from his perjorative terms): We are coming to the day when society is utterly failing at its ability to inform people of morality; only through an intense, personal, religious spirituality was the Western value of human life asserted. The great deeds of Christian leaders established a reservoir of moral social expectations. When that resevoir runs dry, only those who look solely to God will keep lit the flickering flame of truth. And those such people, Sanger regards as "know-nothing religious fundamentalists."
51
posted on
12/02/2005 5:02:39 PM PST
by
dangus
To: wagglebee
52
posted on
12/02/2005 5:02:56 PM PST
by
dangus
To: infidel29
I just wish Singer would be morally convicted of the evil of kingdomism and foreswear eating anything at all.
53
posted on
12/02/2005 5:04:09 PM PST
by
dangus
To: Reactionary
Utilitarianism lacks "first principles." Usefulness begs the question, "useful to what end?"
54
posted on
12/02/2005 5:05:52 PM PST
by
dangus
To: wagglebee
I don't dislike many people, but Peter Singer is certainly the exception. Elitist bastard, advocating the deaths of others. The world would be so much better off without him. He should realize this and pull his own plug...this evening, preferably.
55
posted on
12/02/2005 5:12:55 PM PST
by
Ol' Sox
To: Argus
I suspect you're right. I've toyed with the idea of finding some pseudo-scholarly Nazi tract and redacting it to remove 'Jew', 'race' and the like, and put in the corresponding terms in the lexicon of the postmodernist multicultural left and trying to do a Sokal with it. After the paper appeared, I'd publish the original and the fake side-by-side, thus completing a reductio ad Hitlerum of the early 21st century left.
56
posted on
12/02/2005 5:25:13 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: wagglebee
It makes the Nazis and their perverted science look tame. Good thing I won't be alive to witness it taking hold and for all our sakes, I devoutly hope it doesn't. Peter Singer isn't the "great living philosopher," he's a barbarian and a very effective apostle for Social Darwinism. He's managed to oversee the revival of everything we thought was buried with the demise of Hitler. Its frightening. I guess I am a know-nothing religious fundamentalist when it comes to revering the sacredness of human life and nothing will ever change my beliefs in that respect as long as I live on this earth.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
57
posted on
12/02/2005 5:33:05 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: RegulatorCountry
It is also true that 'they who can, do; they who cannot, supervise'.
Dead wood abounds, to be sure.
58
posted on
12/02/2005 5:46:17 PM PST
by
Thumper1960
("There is no 'tolerance', there are only changing fashions in intolerance." - 'The Western Standard')
To: wagglebee
Why doesn't he just come out and say he wants the world to look like Logan's Run?
59
posted on
12/02/2005 6:13:27 PM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: dangus
Singer, a strict utilitarian Has the term "utilitarian" been permanently hijacked by this movement? I will take it as Doublespeak, for the moment.
I am a 'utilitarian', but in the very spirit of the word, I am willing to discard the term and adopt a new label if that's what's required.
60
posted on
12/02/2005 6:30:56 PM PST
by
SteveMcKing
("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson