[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

One part of this story stands out as BS. Why would the LA Times forgo an opportunity to trash the LAPD? Why would they "cover up" for the LAPD?

[abigkahuna]

Because the City of LA could be force o pay350 million or more in a civil sut filed by the Bigge Familiy i what I read. It would be the downfall of the democrat machine in LA and rest of the State....Remember Southern California controls what happens in the rest of the state.

The LA TImes has to stick with its bogus story and coverups because to losemeans not being able to control the machinations of Sacramento. Remember when Arnold ran for gov...the ripping and scandalous articlesby theTImes almost sankhis bid. They were draggingout everyone they couldthink ofto claim that Arnold "Fondled" them...RIght up to electionday the stories ran....

Will this be the death knell of liberal media....

As an aside---frankly I don;t careif a paper is liberal of conservative--just so long as its labelled as such...Hell take pride in bias!THen we can read and decide.... But slant is one thing.....facts are another... good night all