Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy Republicans (Closet Democrat Arnold Schwarzenegger has kicked the door wide open)
The American Prowler ^ | 12/2/2005 | George Neumayr

Posted on 12/01/2005 9:38:28 PM PST by nickcarraway

Arnold Schwarzenegger's selection of archliberal Susan Kennedy, a former Cabinet secretary to Gray Davis, as his new chief of staff "is the last straw for a lot of grassroots California Republicans," says California Republican Assembly president Mike Spence to TAS. Spence describes the appointment as the equivalent of "George Bush appointing Howard Dean to be his chief of staff."

Even the jaw of George Skelton (the Los Angeles Times columnist who has spent much of his career telling the California GOP to move left) dropped after the appointment of Kennedy, who is one of the state's leading abortion proponents, a high-profile lesbian activist, and a former aide to many prominent California Democrats. "There simply is no precedent -- at least in any current political lifetime -- for what Schwarzenegger did Wednesday. Appoint a hard-core, dedicated soldier from the enemy camp as his chief of staff. Not just an 'advisor' or 'counselor' -- but his No. 1, his alter ego," Skelton wrote.

The door behind which Schwarzenegger kept his de facto Democratic ideology has long been ajar and visible, but now he has kicked it wide open, and not even craven, win-at-all-costs Republicans can ignore it. Susan Kennedy herself blurted out the basic truth about Schwarzenegger: "I think a moderate Democrat and a moderate Republican -- there is not a lot of light between us."

This point had been made during the Recall, but California GOP officials, relying on the usual "Big Tent" song-and-dance and shallow pragmatic arguments, cast it aside. They were given a choice between a meaningful victory with real Republican Tom McClintock or a hollow victory with a de facto Democrat, and they chose the latter. One immediate problem was solved, but multiple new and longterm ones were created.

A conservative revolt is brewing and will likely upend the "French wing" of the California Republican Party, says Spence. He has been bombarded with calls and phone calls from seething California Republicans. They feel burned and view the Kennedy appointment as a point of no return. There is talk, he says, of drafting Tom McClintock to run against Schwarzenegger, and "Mel Gibson's name is being floated."

That a center-left Republican like Schwarzenegger will do more damage than a liberal Democrat is almost axiomatic at this point, and rank-and-file Republicans have been burned enough times to realize it. Because "moderate" Republicans appear less crazy than liberal Democrats and can neutralize Republican resistance through false promises and fake appeals to party unity, they can get away with all sorts of dubious things. Many of Schwarzenegger's "accomplishments" -- from his billions-for-cloning proposition to his gun and environmental laws to his routine appointment of Democrats to judgeships -- are moves that would have met stiff resistance had Gray Davis proposed them.

Schwarzenegger's selection of a former Gray Davis cabinet secretary as his chief of staff perfectly illustrates the lost opportunity of the Recall: instead of ending the Gray Davis agenda, the Recall extended it, and shrewd Democrats who let Davis twist in the wind knew it, seeing Schwarzenegger as a Trojan horse for liberalism and a far more effective proponent of the Davis agenda than Davis ever was or would be.

The California Republicans had a huge percentage of the Recall vote to work with, and they squandered it on a celebrity who just happened to have an R. after his name. Had Schwarzenegger not parachuted into the race on the Jay Leno show (which was one of many signs that California Republicans were about to be taken on a very silly ride) and so easily convinced GOP leaders to back him despite his obvious indifference to much of their stated platform, Tom McClintock would have won easily, and the direction of the state government would have changed substantially. Real debates, not the me-too debates into which Schwarzenegger has been consistently drawn, would have occurred, and the party would have grown through morale-boosting fights.

Schwarzenegger's chief-of-staff fiasco confirms that when the Republican Party forfeits its principles in order to win, it has no principles left once it does, leaving it in tatters, both philosophically and politically. Even the crassly political argument for blindly supporting Schwarzenegger -- that his glow would cause the ranks of the California Republican Party to swell -- has proven illusory. The state party is now viewed as a pitiful arm of the hybrid Schwarzenegger administration, wholly severed from the conservative movement and useless to propel its officeholders to victory.

Schwarzenegger hasn't enlarged or energized the Republican base, and his blatant giving away of the store is likely to undercut the chances of Republican officeholders across the board in the next election. The Kennedy appointment, plus Schwarzenegger's plan to give the Democrats much of what they want in the next budget, is expected to sap morale when the party's aspirants need it most.

"This is kind of the thing that can hurt all our state wide nominees," says Spence. "This is going to drag down the whole party."

George Neumayr is executive editor of The American Spectator.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: burned; cagop; calappointment; california; camilk; cra; frenchwing; georgeneumayr; gop; graydavis; kennedy; mikespence; neumayr; principles; republican; schwarzenegger; susankennedy; trojanhorse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-191 next last
To: Hildy

Nope, not happy. Just R-I-G-H-T.


41 posted on 12/01/2005 10:31:12 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
...McCain has proven he is not deserving of praise for much of anything since he ran for elected office.

And yet, outside of Rudy Giuliani, he's the most popular politician in America.

42 posted on 12/01/2005 10:32:07 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Get some help.


43 posted on 12/01/2005 10:32:11 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

So what does R I G H T get you? Did you vote in the special election?


44 posted on 12/01/2005 10:32:38 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

The republican party in CA is questionable as to whether they can every win statewide again without arnold.

----

What the heck are you drinking anyway?

He could care less about the GOP party and growing it in this state and has said it openly.

Why do you think he was p'd off when President Bush made a visit right before the election and refused to appear with him?

Now we know why. It might have actually pushed a couple of props over the top, and that is the last thing the dems and their actor wanted to see, especially after spending all the dough.


45 posted on 12/01/2005 10:33:22 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Incrementalism is fine. The problem is is that we want to move towards C-O-N-S-E-R-V-A-T-I-S-M, not towards M-A-R-X-I-S-M. Give it up, your boy just done jumped the shark for all to see.


46 posted on 12/01/2005 10:34:20 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
or is it Howard Dean's office ?

In the words of Ronald Reagan, there you go again.

You substitute mindless name calling instead of reasoned argument.

47 posted on 12/01/2005 10:34:23 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Oh, Hildy. Accept him for what he is, a Kennedy.


48 posted on 12/01/2005 10:35:05 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Congratulations. Someday I can retire and have "Medal of Honor" Playstation marathons.


49 posted on 12/01/2005 10:35:35 PM PST by streetpreacher (If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

glub glub,,


50 posted on 12/01/2005 10:35:56 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Yep, if Arnold had gotten more support in the special election, he wouldn't have appointed all those Democrat judges he appointed before the election, and he wouldn't have pushed his billions-for-cloning proposition and supported all those gun and environmental laws like he did before the special election. Er... yeah, that's the ticket.

Go Arnold.


51 posted on 12/01/2005 10:36:05 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

What does R-I-G-H-T get me ? It looks like it's getting my state your J-O-B-S. Good job, Ah-nold, you're scaring the straights all the way to Tennessee... Something Governor McClintock would NEVER have allowed happen on his watch. Hey, from my state to yours, thanks a bunch. ;-)


52 posted on 12/01/2005 10:36:30 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Publius

lol.. which says a helluva lot about many voters who are so easily swayed, eh?


53 posted on 12/01/2005 10:37:00 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
"FRinos"

Ooooo! That's perfect!! I love it!!!

I think I detected a sleeper troll upstream on this very thread that's been lurking here since 1999, no less...

54 posted on 12/01/2005 10:37:48 PM PST by SierraWasp (The only thing that can save CA is making eastern CA the 51st state called Sierra Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Conservatives in CA will always be losers, all talk, no action and no drive....have fun on your slide downhill.


55 posted on 12/01/2005 10:37:59 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Well, I'm sure you are quite the expert on mindlessness. ;-) Still pining away for Nelson Rockefeller to come save the day. Too bad he died with his member-enhancing pump in the "on" switch, he might've just made it to the White House. :-D


56 posted on 12/01/2005 10:38:34 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

You know, some people like to use rino to denigrate someone who disagrees with them on some issue.

I think we should start using moonbat conservative to describe people who would rather lose and have a democrat in power than support a good person who is not as pure a conservative as they would like.


57 posted on 12/01/2005 10:39:27 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Sweetie, it's pretty hard to clean up liberal messes when you're always kneecapping us. How 'bout shutting up for a few minutes and let the grown-ups run things for a change, hmm ?


58 posted on 12/01/2005 10:40:47 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Me too. Your bitching and moaning and occasional opus was tiresome. You were part of the problem, not the solution. Good riddance.
59 posted on 12/01/2005 10:42:03 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (RINOs - the other white meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

I have another name for folks like you who come onto grown-up websites spreading spam all over the place...

T-R-O-L-L.


60 posted on 12/01/2005 10:42:11 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson