Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DuckFan4ever
"Maleng called the legal reasoning "strained" and said he plans to ask Secretary of State Sam Reed and Attorney General Rob McKenna whether providing residential addresses is necessary."

WHAT?! Of course you should have to provide a RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS....what kind of an idiot is Maleng.....(oh, don't answer that....I already know.)

4 posted on 12/01/2005 10:37:58 PM PST by goodnesswins (I'll fight a war in my time......so my grandchildren have peace in theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goodnesswins

Actually, the democrats had taken the position that you can't CHALLENGE the registration of a voter on the grounds that they did not submit their residential address unless you could identify the ACTUAL residential address.

In other words, it was not enough to show that the voter's address was a post box in a mail center, you had to provide the voter's actual address--in another county, another state, another country, or whereever. Even if you could prove that the mail was being forwarded to China--too bad, no specific residential address, so that voter still gets to vote!


6 posted on 12/01/2005 11:10:42 PM PST by TheConservator (Confutatis maledictis, . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson