[supercat]

Here is a review of the textbook . Click on the URL.

Did you notice this bit?

In place of the solid treatment of birth control that graced the 1996 book, the 2000 version has a muddled, confused, polemical section called "The Case for Total Abstinence for Young People." This section starts out with the vague and unfounded claim that "society as a whole believes that sexual relations should be practiced within the bonds of marriage."

Oh, really? Which "society as a whole" is that?

The textbook seems new-agey, but not necessarily in a fashion entirely consistent with leftist thought (much to the chagrin of the reviewer).

[Renegade]

This is not science ! That statement belongs in the Sex Ed curriculum .In my school district, they taught THAT material in 6th grade health class.