Posted on 12/01/2005 11:27:55 AM PST by Spiff
"Matter can neither be created nor destroyed."
Not really true...
Yeah, that's garbage. I'd complain.
I wouldn't let my children by taught by an atheist. This is what you get.
I think you need to find a school where they teach this as "The Laffer Curve" and understand that optimal size is often reached before dinosaur stature is reached.
But that is what we were all taught? How can it not be true if our science teachers said it was? I am very upset!
"My 8th grader is not allowed to bring her Science textbook home."
Is that even legal??? I mean, that parents CANNOT know what their child is being taught?
Revisionism: How to Identify It In Your Children's Textbooks
http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/search/detail.php?ResourceID=116
Go to Amazon.com and look up "Global Science" in the Books section. There are bunches of used copies available, starting at just $1.98. Get your own copy. That way you'll know exactly what you're dealing with.
Even if you like it, your daughter will have her own copy for homework, etc.
This is not science. It is philosophy, or at best, "social studies." I wouldn't stand for it.
And a tree died in order to print that text book. What a waste.
He, he... The law of conservation of matter was once considered true--until Einstein came up with his equation e=mc[squared].
I like the old wording better: "To each according to his needs, from each according to his ability."
Communism ain't dead -- it's become Science!!!
less of this crap in private catholic schools.
Matter created itself from nothing with no energy available to do it.
ask for a meeting abou this 'textbook'
pull your shild out if this is the crap they are filling her head with
While you are at it, you might want to look into how some Indians got buffalo meat before they had horses to hunt them on. It involves a herd of buffalo and a cliff.
Sounds like Communism.
I love how liberals accuse conservatives of being "against science", and eschew intelligent design because they say it's not scientific, then put some drivel like this in a science book:
"Responsibility of the Born: All persons must be held responsible for their own pollution. "
Last I checked, opinions such as these are not scientific in the slightest.
I can only say that it raises a red flag that the teacher bought these books himself. Him, I would look over as closely as the book itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.