Skip to comments.
Pupil Discovers Camera In School Bathroom (and Gets Suspended for It!)
WMAZ ^
| 11/30/2005
| n/a
Posted on 12/01/2005 11:12:40 AM PST by Pyro7480
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
To: Pyro7480
Rather than ripping out the camera, he should have alerted others and contacted his parents and/or the cops.
The principal should be under investigation.
To: Pyro7480
Just a note from a former PI with some background in issues like this.
In most states, it is quite legal to place cameras in locations where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. It is legal (at least in the Commonwealth of Virginia) to place a camera in a bathroom so long as it is not pointing inside of a stall (where someone would expect privacy). In an open area of a bathroom (where there are multiple stalls or urinals) you do not expect privacy. Anyone could walk in and see you in these locations.
You might be surprised at the number of retail stores that have cameras in their restrooms....
42
posted on
12/01/2005 11:51:01 AM PST
by
Dubya-M-Dees
(Mary Mapes was the first in the MSM that had to participate in an election by the people... she lost)
To: Pyro7480
If the principal was worried about vandalism in the mens' room, why didn't he assign a male teacher or go himself between classes and catch them? A camera seems to me to be extreme, yet I think both sides have a valid argument here. Do you have the right to pee in private, or does the school have the right to make sure you don't pee on the walls by photographing what you do when you relieve yourself?
43
posted on
12/01/2005 11:52:38 AM PST
by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: wideawake
44
posted on
12/01/2005 11:59:32 AM PST
by
enraged
To: Pyro7480
Brownsville Station: Smoking in the Boys Room
To: thecabal
What the hell is wrong with FR lately? I can't believe that there are people here that apparently think it's OK for the school to film 8th grade boys in the bathroom. That kid made the right assumption that some pervert put that in there, and he did the right thing by taking it out. Gawd, there's some sick, twisted puppies out there if they think the boy was wrong. What you are seeing are the Statist, "LEO-Uber-Alles", Authority-Is-G_D crowd here.
You may notice they are the first to defend Bad Cops, and blame "perps" for everything. This kid isn't even accused of ANYTHING, and some are painting him as a suspect or criminal!
It's been a staple here for a long time.
46
posted on
12/01/2005 12:01:38 PM PST
by
Itzlzha
("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
To: geezerwheezer
We don't know the story here. It's possible that kids were ripping towel dispensers off the wall, breaking mirrors, etc. And its also likely possible to put a camera in one of those bathrooms in a way that doesn't view kids in stall, and with the boys' backs to the camera's when they are using the urinal. Depending upon the vandalism and the placement of the camera, it might not be that bad of an idea.
47
posted on
12/01/2005 12:05:57 PM PST
by
XJarhead
To: cripplecreek
I suspect that if you placed a camera in a public bathroom, that you would face some sort of legal action though.
To: Talking_Mouse
Is there also a camera in the girls bathroom?Was there vandalism in the girl's bathroom that warrated a camera?
49
posted on
12/01/2005 12:08:55 PM PST
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(Karen Ryan reporting...)
To: Pyro7480
If you put cameras in the bathrooms, my kids will pee in your office.
50
posted on
12/01/2005 12:10:01 PM PST
by
mad puppy
( The Southern border needs to be a MAJOR issue in 2006 and 2008)
To: Pyro7480
Turn the principal and local DA in to the Feds for possession and distribution of child pornography.
To: add925
He's probably been pulling his own while viewing the pictures. He needs to be fired at the least.
52
posted on
12/01/2005 12:11:10 PM PST
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: thoughtomator
What's the difference between this and child porn?" While having a camera in a bathroom might violate some statutes. It would not be child porn. Here is an excerpt from a group that accepts reports of illegal websites:What content isn`t child pornography?
* Text describing child pornography or explicit sexual behavior of/with children is not illegal.
* Child modeling sites, (i.e. childsupermodel.com) are not illegal. ASACP does not accept child-modeling sites as Sponsors or Approved Members, but these sites are legal.
* At this time animations, drawings and cartoons are legal.
* Child nudity does not always equal child pornography. The determining factor with child pornography is not whether the child is nude, partially nude, or fully clothed. The determining factor is what the child is doing and/or having done to him/her is.
53
posted on
12/01/2005 12:16:42 PM PST
by
ozoneliar
("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
To: Pyro7480
I do not see a problem with keeping track of the bathroom. The camera could be preventing even more serious problems.
As for who is watching - the pervert issue---I'm not sure how to solve that. Who's monitoring the monitors?
54
posted on
12/01/2005 12:20:27 PM PST
by
eleni121
(s.)
To: ozoneliar
So if the child is urinating, does that qualify as child pornography?
55
posted on
12/01/2005 12:23:09 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(What'ya mean you formatted the cat!?)
To: eleni121; All
There is no good reason to put a camera in a children's bathroom. I would have taken it out too.
If I were the parents, I would be pressing the School District with legal action.
56
posted on
12/01/2005 12:25:01 PM PST
by
Stashiu
(RVN, 1969-70)
To: thoughtomator
So if the child is urinating, does that qualify as child pornography? I'm researching relevant USC and GA statutes right now.
57
posted on
12/01/2005 12:26:07 PM PST
by
ozoneliar
("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
To: Pyro7480
This principal is just following the Marxists plan for statism, taking away all sense of individual privacy at a young age. They are conditioning our children. Public schools are indoctrination breeding grounds for the communists.
What is not taught is an honor system, a system that depends upon individuals to practice civil discourse.
58
posted on
12/01/2005 12:27:59 PM PST
by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
To: Pyro7480
Is there a reply from principle George Michaels?
59
posted on
12/01/2005 12:28:03 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: cripplecreek
...but the kid had no right to steal it either I for one would not convict him for stealing, no more than I would convict the players in the Boston Tea Party of any crime.
60
posted on
12/01/2005 12:30:51 PM PST
by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson