[TOWER]

Of course, ID — like any other scientific theory — stands or falls not according to its political and diplomatic utility, but according to the evidence. So: Is ID true?

I like he says this, and then procedes to not cite one piece of positive evidence for ID. He just rambles off the same old crap against evolution.

[atlaw]

I like he says this, and then procedes to not cite one piece of positive evidence for ID.

And, in the face of this evidentiary vacuum, employs the most transparent dodge: There is a huge and growing body of ID literature produced by some of the world's finest minds, and I won't attempt even to summarize the overwhelming evidence it presents for design in nature.

I am also wondering what the Creationist/ID camp makes of this statement: That's why something called the Wedge Document — although horrifying to America's secularist intelligentsia — offers a message of hope for Muslims.