I may be missing some fundamental tenets of intelligent design, but it seems to me that the idea that a Supreme Being established the processes by which biology works, and by which evolution is thought to have progressed, does not conflict with any bit of proven scienceIf that were all that ID is, few of us would have any problem with it, though it shouldn't be taught in science class, since the above is a metaphysical and untestable contention.)
My point was that the same people who are aghast at an atheist teaching religious studies, insist that someone who rejects the fundamental principles of modern biology be allowed to teach it.
"My point was that the same people who are aghast at an atheist teaching religious studies, insist that someone who rejects the fundamental principles of modern biology be allowed to teach it."
Oh please time and time again evolutionists claim superiority over biology and say there is no place for the Creator in their design and they say ID need be in a philosophy or theology class.
Seems now the dirty little secret is that the evolutionists own both departments and this anti-Christian with the backing of the evolutionists anti-God crowd planned to teach the "fundies" a lesson.