Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Intelligence Committee to probe Cunningham's work on panel
AP via SF Gate ^ | November 30, 2005 | ERICA WERNER

Posted on 11/30/2005 9:22:59 PM PST by ncountylee

The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee has asked committee attorneys to review former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham's work on the panel to ensure he didn't improperly influence committee actions or decisions.

Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., ordered the review after learning of Cunningham's guilty plea Monday to charges of corruption and tax evasion for taking $2.4 million in bribes, mostly from two defense contractors, in exchange for steering government business their way, said committee spokesman Jamal Ware.

Hoekstra also ordered Cunningham's access to classified information terminated immediately, Ware said Wednesday.

"He believes these concerns are incredibly serious, and that there has to be certainty that everything was done above-board on the Intelligence Committee," Ware said. He said, however, that Hoekstra did not believe Cunningham had improperly influenced committee business.

Cunningham, R-Calif., resigned from Congress after reaching the guilty plea. He was in his eighth term and had served since 2001 on the Intelligence Committee, and since this year as chairman of the panel's subcommittee on terrorism and human intelligence.

Committee lawyers will review committee bills and programs over which the panel has oversight authority for signs of improper involvement by Cunningham, Ware said.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 109th; 50thdistrict; california; cunningham; dukecunningham; graft; randycunningham; republican; sandiego

1 posted on 11/30/2005 9:22:59 PM PST by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

When are the defense contractors going to be charged with bribing public officials?


2 posted on 11/30/2005 9:31:58 PM PST by RTINSC (What, Me Worry?..My company offers French benefits...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

I hope that enough of the man that Cunningham was remained that he didnt put our troops in danger because of contracts that should never have happened.


3 posted on 11/30/2005 9:37:15 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

When are the scumbags who dishonor the trust they were given when elected to office going to receive the tar 'n feathers that they most certainly deserve?


4 posted on 11/30/2005 9:43:06 PM PST by RasterMaster ("Bin Laden shows others the road to Paradise, but never offers to go along for the ride." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
From the Plea agreement (PDF) :
b. Defendant made recommendations and took other official action in order to influence the United States Congress's appropriations of funds to benefit Coconspirator No. 1 and Coconspirator No. 2, which defendant did, in part, because of his receipt of the above-described payments and benefits, and not because using Coconspirators Nos. 1 and 2 was in the best interest of the country;

c. Defendant used his public office and took other official action to pressure and influence United States Department of Defense personnel to award and execute government contracts in a manner that would benefit Coconspirator No. 1 and Coconspirator No. 2, which defendant did, in part, because of his receipt of the above-described payments and 'benefits, and not because using Coconspirators Nos. 1 and 2 was in the best interest of the country;

d. Defendant used his public office and took other official action in a manner that would benefit Coconspirator No. 3, which defendant did because of his receipt of the above¬described payments and benefits;


5 posted on 12/01/2005 12:59:31 AM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
I hadn't even considered that. He better not have put his fellow veterans in harms way to get a $7000 antique French toilet!

Can't believe such a morally bankrupt scumbag could have represented my district.

6 posted on 12/01/2005 1:41:30 AM PST by newzjunkey (Why we fight for a free Iraq: http://massgraves.info/ -- Don't spare Tookie, Arnold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

"Can't believe such a morally bankrupt scumbag could have represented my district."


Term limits.

Duke was a good man once. He turned to the dark side.
You look at his background and it just makes it so much worse. why?


7 posted on 12/01/2005 8:13:42 AM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson