Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge; jude24; P-Marlowe; Congressman Billybob; aristeides; winstonchurchill

There is no such thing as the religion that this Judge has decreed.

Which religion is it that is Christian based but FORBIDS praying in Jesus name?

I can't think of a single one.

The problem with this judge's decision is that HE, the Judge, has CREATED a religion for the benefit of the STATE.

This judge has created a preferred religion and required that it be used instead of the real religions that do exist in America. Isn't that what "established religion" means...or at least is close enough to make a thinking man worry?


33 posted on 12/01/2005 4:16:43 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carl/NewsMax; MLedeen; JohnHuang2

ping to #33


35 posted on 12/01/2005 4:25:11 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
You are getting to the real point ~ if a judge dictates that something of a religious nature not be said in public, then he has himself established the bounds of a qualified religion.

That is exactly what the First Amendment prohibits and the judge should be flayed.

36 posted on 12/01/2005 4:51:00 AM PST by muawiyah (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson