Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge rules in Indiana House prayer suit (bars Christian prayers at House sessions openings)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 11/30/05 | Deanna Martin - ap

Posted on 11/30/2005 6:40:50 PM PST by NormsRevenge

INDIANAPOLIS - A federal judge on Wednesday barred the Indiana House from opening its sessions with specifically Christian prayers, ruling that such prayers amount to "an official endorsement of the Christian religion."

Judge David Hamilton advised House Speaker Brian Bosma that invocations given in the Legislature should not use the name of Jesus Christ or Christian terms such as savior.

Of 53 opening prayers given in the House during the 2005 session, 41 were given by clergy identified with Christian churches and at least 29 mentioned Jesus Christ, according to court documents.

Hamilton said that practice "amounts in practical terms to an official endorsement of the Christian religion."

"All are free to pray as they wish in their own houses of worship or in other settings," Hamilton wrote. "Those who wish to participate in a practice of official prayer must be willing to stay within constitutional bounds."

Bosma called the ruling an "intolerable decision" that threatened free speech. He said he has directed his lawyers to study ways to overturn the decision.

The Indiana Civil Liberties Union challenged the prayer practices in a lawsuit on behalf of four people, including a Quaker lobbyist, who said they found the tradition of offering the usually Christian prayers offensive.

"The prayers send a very powerful message of exclusion to those who are not of that denomination," said Ken Falk, the ICLU's legal director.

Dozens of religious leaders signed a statement saying House prayers should honor religious diversity.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: aclu; churchandstate; davidhamilton; iclu; indianahouse; judge; judicialactivism; judicialtyranny; moralabsolutes; prayer; prayersuit; rules; ruling; voluntaryprayer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: NormsRevenge
All are free to pray as they wish in their own houses of worship or in other settings

Ridiculous. A spoken prayer is not a prayer; it's a speech. No speeches in the Indiana House?

61 posted on 12/01/2005 11:11:46 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morris_Hattrick
What you are missing here is that the jackbooted thugs in the government have no authority to interpret for you how you may pray, where you may pray, and what words you may use.

It is every Christian's moral and ethical obligation to defend the right to pray in Jesus' name to the death. The priod of martyrdom is apparantly not yet over.

62 posted on 12/01/2005 4:18:34 PM PST by muawiyah (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears; DakotaGator

Exactly. They should just ignore it, and let the pieces fall where they may. The only way judicial supremacy will ever truly be challenged and thwarted is if the other branches of govt refuse to obey their unconstitutional rulings. Sure, it may lead to a Constitutional showdown, or even crisis, but if that is what it takes, then so be it. Its getting very frustrating being in a position where we must wait with bated breath to see if the latest GOP SCOTUS nominee is another disaster or not, and hope against hope that they are not.


63 posted on 12/01/2005 6:28:58 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: Morris_Hattrick
Brer Mo, you really missed that one. The Constitution says the government has no authority whatsoever over any element of religion.

There's no "tradesies" clause in there.

65 posted on 12/02/2005 10:26:15 AM PST by muawiyah (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: Morris_Hattrick
Free exercise is free exercise ~ period. Case closed.

Here's a thought for you ~ let's say the same judge had decided that if a Jewish rabbi were invited by the members of the General Assembly to provide the benediction that he could no longer say "Amen" or "God".

That's exactly what this particular federal judge has done, but in terms of Christian obligations, devotion and language.

He is so obviously wrong there really can be no argument that he should be treated derisively and then ignored.

67 posted on 12/02/2005 6:53:36 PM PST by muawiyah (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: CondorFlight
It is false that the state of Massachusetts paid its clergy until 1840. Although the law was not abolished until 1833, nobody was stupid enough to try and used the sword, after 1780, to collect the financial contributions from someone who didn't want to pay.

The Baptists and other dissenters in the Evil and Wicked State of Massachusetts contributed directly to the church of their choice and told the local authorities to go back to the Government Church of Satan where they worshiped and tell Old Scratch to go jump back into his hole with Patsy Henry, Oliver Ellsworth and all the other Counterfeit Christians.
69 posted on 01/18/2006 11:03:03 AM PST by FredFlash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson