gives us Tom Kratman's vision of what a Hillary presidency would look like (substitute Hillary Clinton for Wilhelmina Rottemeyer and read on).
Kind of chilling, really, but an excellent read.
Click on the picture for more information on the book.
Posted on 11/30/2005 2:19:55 PM PST by Daralundy
"Ooooh, isn't Hillary acting so (gasp!) MODERATE," say all the chattering little lefties, conspiratorially.
bttt
Hillary Clinton is the future 'Manchurian candidate.' She is a Stalinist who will rob Americans of their constitution. She should never be trusted and never be elected to any office!
While Breslin's liver may continue to function, his brain died long, long ago.
gives us Tom Kratman's vision of what a Hillary presidency would look like (substitute Hillary Clinton for Wilhelmina Rottemeyer and read on).
Kind of chilling, really, but an excellent read.
Click on the picture for more information on the book.
"where Herself stands"
LOL, perfect. Such faux-WASP-ish, NY affectation. I once was acquainted with a well-known direct mail consultant from Pound Ridge, who constantly referred to her husband in the first person as "Himself."
This may be a newsflash but Hillary isn't a demonical genius and the Democrat base is not this monolith in perfect accord managing this great masquerade of discord that will ultimately vanish when she gets the nomination (as is the plan).
Nope.
I don't buy it.
The truth is that Hillary is a Marxist at her core. Whereas her husband was a triangulation type of guy with no core values he was above trading if to his advantage. Clinton won election through triangulation. Hill doesn't think her marxist views will win her election, she did watch her Hillarycare flame out. She's attempting to mimic her husband, to less success.
The Hard left sees her as a sell out to her Core being. Imagine Reagan selling out the heart of conservatism for political expediency. It's a shot in the gut to this group.
They don't like her. This is not an act.
Would they support her if chosen? Yeah. They sucked it up and supported kerry. Doesn't mean they want her to represent them. She isn't a sure thing, if she was, she'd never have put out that jump the shark fence straddling comment on the Iraq war yesterday. That's the act of a woman that is coming to realize they aren't going to settle for a wink and a nod and GIVE her this nomination as she had assumed.
hillary knows what she's doing.
she has to try and convince the moderate voters that she isn't as far left as she really is, so she has to vote certain ways at times and say certain things to get the far left wackos riled up to make herself appear 'moderate'
she's hoping the uninformed voting moderates will believe what the liberal media feeds them......hillary is moderate......hillary is moderate....hillary is moderate...repeat until brainwashed.
hillary knows she has to try to appear moderate for the swing voters, and she knows the extreme wacko fringe will still throw their support behind her because their leaders know it's a scam
No, those obituary stories were for the brain cells that died in this boozer's head...
nothing but a sham...
We have a winner!!
She thinks supporting the war is her sheeps clothing to hide her wolf-ness from our sensible eyes.
How stupid does she think the electoral college and the popular vote are?!
"It's the economy, stupid." "Americans vote with their pocketbooks"
We all remember those slogans. Hillary's problem is our economy is fantastic, unemployment near record levels. She figures Iraq will be settled before 2008 and off the news. She can only hope the economy turns upside down for a 2008 run.
Breslin's skills curdled into poison and hate at least a decade ago. He hasn't written anything interesting since.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.