To: Hildy
You're at a loss because there isn't a valid non-religious reason the state should allow straights should marry and gays shouldn't.
As Hildy pointed out, however, there is a valid reason the state shouldn't stick its nose into marriage period.
12 posted on
11/30/2005 2:13:42 PM PST by
Sols
To: Sols
As rhombus pointed out, I mean. :)
14 posted on
11/30/2005 2:14:25 PM PST by
Sols
To: Sols
You're at a loss because there isn't a valid non-religious reason the state should allow straights should marry and gays shouldn't. Sure there is. Marriage is about producing and raising children, that the society or state can continue.
114 posted on
11/30/2005 2:34:27 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Sols
You're at a loss because there isn't a valid non-religious reason the state should allow straights should marry and gays shouldn't. Sure there is. Marriage is about producing and raising children, that the society or state can continue.
116 posted on
11/30/2005 2:35:05 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson