Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj
Troublesome that sounds, but then again, maybe he "grew" in the right direction. At least Daniels has more government experience than Golisano (of course, that can cut both ways).

Sort of, he got alot of his experince under Dinkins.

Under Pataki he became secretary of state, but the department is essentially a giant dumping ground for political appointees.

If he anything, he's just learned to be a more political animal and more about cronyism.

FWIT, if Golisano does get the nomination for the GOP, Pataki may endorse Spitzer or he will stay neutral....according to Patakis people.

66 posted on 12/01/2005 9:55:30 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Sonny M

All in all, it doesn't look terribly promising for next year in retaining the Governorship. I'm not sure I could entirely blame Pataki for wanting to sandbag Golisano, as Golisano was trying to do just that in the past election. Golisano is no loyal Republican, so Pataki certainly doesn't owe him a damn thing.


69 posted on 12/01/2005 12:36:54 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson