Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is a New Ice Age Under Way? [Anti Global Warming Alert]
21st Century Science & Technology Magazine ^ | 10/19/2005 | Laurence Hecht

Posted on 11/30/2005 11:48:49 AM PST by WmCraven_Wk

“Watch out, Al Gore. The glaciers will get you!” With that appended note, my friend, retired field geologist Jack Sauers, forwarded to me a report that should have been a lead item in every newspaper in the world. It was the news that the best-measured glacier in North America, the Nisqually on Mount Rainier, has been growing since 1931.

The significance of the fact, immediately grasped by any competent climatologist, is that glacial advance is an early warning sign of Northern Hemisphere chilling of the sort that can bring on an Ice Age. The last Little Ice Age continued from about 1400 to 1850. It was followed by a period of slight warming. There are a growing number of signs that we may be descending into another Little Ice Age—all the mountains of “global warming” propaganda aside.

Our current understanding of the long-term climate cycles shows that for the past 800,000 years, periods of approximately 100,000 years’ duration, called Ice Ages, have been interrupted by periods of approximately 10,000 years, known as Interglacials. (We are now about 10,500 years into the present Interglacial.)

What Causes Ice Ages These cycles are not mere statistical correlations, as some Wall Street prognosticator working at the modern PC version of a ouija board might spin out. They are determined, with great scientific precision, to correlate with long-term, cyclical changes in the Earth’s orbital relationship to the Sun. Three fundamental orbital relationships are involved, each of which contributes to the amount of sunlight received in high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere. When these cycles combine to reduce the incoming solar radiation (insolation) during summer months, over a number of years, the ice sheets which permanently cover Greenland, parts of Alaska, northern Canada, Scandinavia, and elsewhere, begin to advance.

At a certain point, the growth process becomes self-feeding, partly because the high reflectivity of ice and snow reduces the local temperature, partly for reasons that are not fully understood. The glaciers thicken and expand until they become continental ice sheets, one to two miles thick, creeping ever southward. Geological evidence shows that in the last Ice Age, the southern boundary of the continental ice sheet, known as a terminal moraine, stretched down the center of Long Island, through New York City, across New Jersey and Pennsylvania to Southern Illinois and Missouri, then up the Plains States through Montana and Washington State. All of this real estate was buried under one to two miles of ice.

Geologically and climatologically speaking, we are due for another such glacial advance. It might not happen in our lifetimes, but radical shifts in the climate of northern regions can take place suddenly, and in some places may already be taking place.

How to Look at ‘Global Warming’ A very important thing to understand in interpreting all the swill that issues daily from the Global Warming mill (really the anti-industry, anti-population lobby, headed and pumped with money by the Royal Consort Prince Philip, and former Nazi Party member Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands), is that the onset of an Ice Age is not marked by global cooling. In fact, the very same astronomical conditions which cause a cooling at high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere, produce the opposite effect in the Southern Hemisphere, where there is much more ocean to absorb and retain the incoming solar radiation. Thus the global average temperature does not tell us anything of importance.

The geological requirements for an Ice Age are the presence of a large landmass around the Polar Circle and extending southward. A look at the globe, or world map, shows that those conditions exist in the Northern Hemisphere, but not in the Southern. Therefore, the important thing to look at is the climate conditions in northern and far northern regions. Some of the indicators:

• Since 1980, there has been an advance of more than 55% of the 625 mountain glaciers under observation by the World Glacier Monitoring group in Zurich. (From 1926 to 1960, some 70-95% of these glaciers were in retreat.)

• A comparison of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s 1965 and 1990 Plant Hardiness Zone Maps, shows a southward change of one zone, or 10°F, between 1965 and 1990.

• Careful measurements of the oxygen isotope ratios in German oaks, which are rigorously calibrated to temperature data, show a 1°C temperature decline from 1350 to 1800 (the lowpoint of the Little Ice Age). Temperature thereafter increased by 1°C from 1800 to 1930, and has been declining since then.

• From weather stations in the Alps, and in the Nordic countries, we find the temperature decline since 1930 is also 1°C.

• Satellite measurements have shown growth in the height and breadth of the huge Greenland ice sheet, the largest in the Northern Hemisphere

On Nisqually That brings us to the Nisqually glacier, up on the 14,410-foot Mount Rainier, near Tacoma, Wash. Just 85 feet shy of Mount Whitney, the highest point in the lower 48 states, Mount Rainier has 26 glaciers, and is the largest single peak system in the United States.

In 1931, fearful that the receding glacier would provide insufficient runoff for their newly completed hydroelectric facility, Tacoma City Light began careful measurements of the glacier. Since the mid-1800s, the glacier had receded about 1 kilometer. Annual to semi-annual measurements, continued by the U.S. Geological Survey and private contractors for the National Park Service, provide the longest continuous series of glacier measurements in North America.

The details are described in a report by government specialists, which appeared in the September 2000 issue of Washington Geology:

“The greatest thickening during the period of measurement occurred between 1931 and 1945, when the glacier thickened by about 50% near 2,800 meters of altitude. This and subsequent thickenings during the mid-1970s to mid-1980s produced waves that advanced its terminus. Glacier thinning occured during intervening periods. Between 1994 and 1997, the glacier thickened by 17 meters at 2,800-m altitude, indicating probable glacier advance during the first decade of the 21st century.”

That’s the story from Mount Rainier. Retired geologist Sauers, who has been observing conditions in the Cascade Mountains of western Washington for a lifetime, says “I’m preparing for an Ice Age.” Perhaps we all should.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: age; climate; cooling; glacier; global; ice; warming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Additional info from the Winter 2003-2004 Issue of 21st Century Science & Technology

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202004/Winter2003-4/global_warming.pdf

1 posted on 11/30/2005 11:48:52 AM PST by WmCraven_Wk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

Al Gore is deeply saddened.


2 posted on 11/30/2005 11:53:39 AM PST by neodad (My ex-wife is stuck on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

make up your mind! either we're globally warming or going into an ice age!

geez~! it's hard to keep up with the doom/gloom crowd nowadays!


3 posted on 11/30/2005 11:53:41 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

4 posted on 11/30/2005 11:54:58 AM PST by pabianice (I guess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

Issue is far more complex than the article makes it sound.

You can actually have a glacier advance when it gets warmer...if there's increased precipitation at the altitude where the glacier begins.


5 posted on 11/30/2005 11:58:20 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

I'd have a lot more confidence in this magazine if they didn't cite Lyndon Larouche as a science source on the front page of their web site.


6 posted on 11/30/2005 11:58:29 AM PST by gondramB ( A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk
Our current understanding of the long-term climate cycles shows that for the past 800,000 years, periods of approximately 100,000 years’ duration, called Ice Ages, have been interrupted by periods of approximately 10,000 years, known as Interglacials. (We are now about 10,500 years into the present Interglacial.)

In other words, what are called "Ice Ages" are really the natural state. This is one of the "Hot Ages".

7 posted on 11/30/2005 11:58:52 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle

"make up your mind!"

I just presented the opposing argument. The floor is now open for discussion.


8 posted on 11/30/2005 11:59:16 AM PST by WmCraven_Wk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk
No matter which way the Earth's average temp trend is going, the enviro-nuts will still blame mankind for it.
9 posted on 11/30/2005 11:59:29 AM PST by lormand (Close the border...the US/Kalifornia border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
In other words, what are called "Ice Ages" are really the natural state. This is one of the "Hot Ages".

Depends on one's time frame.

In the entire 4 billion year history of the earth, Ice ages are very rare and it's very unusual to have any ice caps at all.

However, within a long-term ice age cycle, the actual ice ages are more common and longer than the interglacials.

10 posted on 11/30/2005 12:00:26 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

i know you'r ejust the messenger, but I need to know whether i need to buy a sweater or shorts!


11 posted on 11/30/2005 12:01:04 PM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

Science and the LaRouche youth movement? Are you one of them?


12 posted on 11/30/2005 12:01:41 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zot

ping


13 posted on 11/30/2005 12:03:35 PM PST by GreyFriar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

read later


14 posted on 11/30/2005 12:05:28 PM PST by TX Bluebonnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
make up your mind! either we're globally warming or going into an ice age!

No, no. Global warming will cause the next ice age. The prediction is that the influx of fresh water from melting ice sheets will shut down oceanic conveyor moving warm water north and cool water south. The loss of the Gulf Stream and start the ice age. Seriously!

15 posted on 11/30/2005 12:05:40 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk
The last Little Ice Age continued from about 1400 to 1850 (440 years).

So, if truly cyclical, we wait another 305 years for it to occur...?

16 posted on 11/30/2005 12:06:45 PM PST by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
make up your mind! either we're globally warming or going into an ice age!

Your statement is probably more apt than you think. Things are probably never stable in our world, so we more than likely ARE or AREN'T warming or cooling. Unfortunately, with the relative lifespan of a firefly's light, we don't have too many ways of measuring planetary trends.

17 posted on 11/30/2005 12:06:45 PM PST by Great Caesars Ghost (History says our political structure and weak stomach will cause us to lose this war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

uh huh. yeah. right.


18 posted on 11/30/2005 12:07:08 PM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

If there is an ice age under way, it's because of global warming and it's Bush's fault.


19 posted on 11/30/2005 12:07:54 PM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality) - "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

I guess the entire "global warming" issue is more "nuanced."


20 posted on 11/30/2005 12:07:57 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson