[GarySpFc]

Again, no scientific data...Just correlation equals causation "studies". I can use the same methodology to prove that love is an addictive and dangerous drug that should be prohibited.

Wrong, wrong, wrong! I quote further from the article.

Recent evidence has added to this scientific consensus. Just last month, researchers in Helena, Montana, showed that the incidence of heart attacks dropped by 60 percent following the city’s adoption of a smoke-free policy in local restaurants and bars.

[MileHi]

...showed that the incidence of heart attacks dropped by 60 percent following the city’s adoption of a smoke-free policy in local restaurants and bars.

When did the law pass? 25 years ago or are they implying that exposure to "second hand smoke" will kill you in a year? Talk about bogus science.

[mugs99]

Wrong, wrong, wrong! I quote further from the article

ROFL!!!
The Helena study has already been called into question by legitimate science. There was a thread on it right here on FR.
The Helena study is bogus.
Why can't you guys produce verifiable scientific data to back up these so called studies?
Everytime this subject comes up I ask for data. Not once has anyone produced verifiable scientific data!
Is science based fact too much to ask for?
.