Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gscc

Then why did Luther remove books after those God-inspired men had established what was canonical?


495 posted on 11/30/2005 12:13:46 PM PST by Romish_Papist (Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies ]


To: Romish_Papist

Luther like Jerome considered them as edyfying but not inspired. Even Pope Gregory the Great (ca 600 AD) when quoting 1 Maccabees says, "We address a testimony from books though not canonical, yet published for the edification of the Church." Most Protestant Bibles up until the 17th century had the Apocryphal books in them although included in a separate section from inspired Scripture. Doctrine should not be formulated through uninspired writings.


497 posted on 11/30/2005 12:27:54 PM PST by gscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson