Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mtbopfuyn

So, let me get this straight....If "limbo" is dropped from Catholic theology, that means that the Catholic Church has been in error about this teaching for some 7+ centuries....Which prompts the question: what else does the church teach that's in error?


44 posted on 11/29/2005 4:15:50 PM PST by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: My2Cents
Which prompts the question: what else does the church teach that's in error?

Apparently, either you have never erred, or you are a complete skeptic.

-A8

58 posted on 11/29/2005 4:24:44 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
If "limbo" is dropped from Catholic theology, that means that the Catholic Church has been in error about this teaching for some 7+ centuries....Which prompts the question: what else does the church teach that's in error?

Ask a Protestant.

78 posted on 11/29/2005 4:33:44 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
If "limbo" is dropped from Catholic theology, that means that the Catholic Church has been in error about this teaching for some 7+ centuries....Which prompts the question: what else does the church teach that's in error?

It can't be dropped, because it was never officially picked up. Catholics have always been free to believe in it or not believe in it as they saw fit. If the Church ever rules one way or the other, it would settle the question, not change it's mind.

109 posted on 11/29/2005 4:50:29 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
So, let me get this straight....If "limbo" is dropped from Catholic theology, that means that the Catholic Church has been in error about this teaching for some 7+ centuries....Which prompts the question: what else does the church teach that's in error?

You don't have the story straight. The limbo of the infants has been a theological speculation for seven centuries. It has never been regarded as a dogmatic teaching of the Church.

128 posted on 11/29/2005 4:57:58 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
You wrote: "So, let me get this straight....If "limbo" is dropped from Catholic theology, that means that the Catholic Church has been in error about this teaching for some 7+ centuries....Which prompts the question: what else does the church teach that's in error?

I don't blame you for asking a question like that, since the whole thing could be pretty perplexing (not to mention annoying) (or even offensive) to folks who are trying to sort out what the Church actually teaches on Divine authority.

Here's the thing. Some things are certainly and infallibly true (e.g. Jesus is God.) These are dogmas. All Christians must believe this.

Some things follow on the basis of strict logic (e.g. Mary is the mother of Jesus, therefore she can be called the mother of God.)

Some things are certain and reasonable inferences, and therefore also doctrines (e.g. the Bible says, God abhors the shedding of innocent blood. But what if you kill a bunch of innocent people by suffocation? No blood shed, so it's okey-dokey? No--- because we can reasonably infer that what God abhors is murder by any means.)

Some things are common pious beliefs (e.g. every person has a guardian angel.) But it's not a defined doctrine. Some things are theological speculations (the four properties of the transformed human body after the resurrection: agility, impassibility, clarity, and subtility.) I like that one a lot, in fact, but it's just a hypothesis.

People WILL speculate about stuff like this. You can't stop them. It's the way people are.

But if you want the straight scoop on what's a TRUTH OF THE FAITH, you get that from the authoritative sources: the Ecumenical Council documents, the consensus of Patristic teachings, the infallible statements of Popes (which are extremely rare), and the Catechism.

You can Google the Catechism ---- it's searchable. I have it in my Favorites

http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc.htm

So, speaking for myself, I'm finding it harder and harder to use ignorance as an excuse.... 8-P

151 posted on 11/29/2005 5:17:07 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Credo in Unam, Sanctam, Catholicam et Apostolicam Ecclesiam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
Catholic Church has been in error about this teaching for some 7+ centuries

But the Church was right for the first 13 centuries and will be so from here on. A trifle in eternity.

278 posted on 11/29/2005 9:35:24 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents

You didn't read the article. It was never a defined dogma, just a theory. The Immaculate Conception was a widely-believed hypothesis until it was infallibly defined as dogma.

I was never taught that the concept of "limbo" was a guaranteed truth. It was always "debated".


302 posted on 11/30/2005 5:10:06 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson