Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan
Though after death is also a possibility. The premises do not entail that this choice is offered before death. Correct? The Fathers were in Limbo because, in part, they were not yet able to choose Christ. Babies are not yet able to choose. We also know that positive development occurs after death (e.g. purgatory). So we need not become Cartesian dualists with regard to babies' capacity for choice in order to deal with this problem. No?

-A8

139 posted on 11/29/2005 5:08:14 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: adiaireton8
Though after death is also a possibility. The premises do not entail that this choice is offered before death. Correct?

No. The choice would be before death. The infants would have to have been given infused knowledge of some kind.

The Fathers were in Limbo because, in part, they were not yet able to choose Christ.

True, but they were able in their lifetimes to choose for or against what truth they knew. They were bound for heaven (or heaven through purgatory) but were in limbo because the gates of heaven were not yet opened.

Babies are not yet able to choose.

True. The ability to make a reasonable choice would have to be infused.

We also know that positive development occurs after death (e.g. purgatory).

Purification and sanctification. But the fundamental choice for God has already been made.

185 posted on 11/29/2005 5:39:12 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson