[Dems_R_Losers]

Of course it will. To "progressives," there is no higher valued activity in life than sexual gratification. It is to be pursued and worshipped, wherever and with whomever (or whatever) you wish, and of course "society" must make sure that you endure no negative consequences from having all the sex you want, including unwanted pregnancy, AIDS, other STDs, mental distress, or negative consequences at work. Dressing our daughters like whores is fine, allowing teenage oral sex parties is great, online porn is OK -- just make sure abortion is legal and we find a cure for AIDS so we can clean up the mess. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a hopeless Puritan hung up on their own sexuality.

I know liberals who really beliefve this stuff. They think conservatives and Catholics are "hung up on sex," "just want everyone to not have sex because they aren't getting any," and want to "punish" women who find contraceptives inconvenient and thus find themselves pregnant, and punish homosexuals by not finding a cure for AIDS.

[TenaciousZ]

I know liberals who really beliefve this stuff.

However, according to their playbook, there indeed is a facet of human sexuality that is deemed unhealthy: any self-chosen suppression of a desire.

[Great Caesars Ghost]

Why do liberals think the answer to poverty must be to birth control and abort the children? They say so there aren't so many mouths to feed, but don't most cultures need a lot of hands to grow the food so there is enough to eat? Isn't that the same zero sum thinking that rejects tax cutting to grow the economy?