Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wicker Calls for U.S.-Mexico Border Fence
US House of Representatives ^ | November 28, 2005 | US Rep. Roger F. Wicker

Posted on 11/28/2005 6:00:09 PM PST by Sybeck1

REPORT FROM CONGRESS By Congressman Roger F. Wicker

WICKER CALLS FOR U.S.-MEXICO BORDER FENCE

A plan to construct a security barrier along the 2,000 mile boundary between the U. S. and Mexico is at the heart of the most sweeping legislation ever introduced to fight illegal immigration and protect America's borders. I have joined as a co-sponsor of this bill, which would strengthen immigration law and send a message to the world that the U.S. is serious about solving this critical problem.

The TRUE Enforcement and Border Security Act includes provisions to increase border patrol agents, give law enforcement authorities more tools to catch and deport illegal aliens, and stiffen penalties on employers who hire undocumented workers.

NATIONAL SECURTY AT STAKE

U. S. Rep. Duncan Hunter, whose district includes the U.S.-Mexico border area in San Diego County, California, is the bill's author. He is also chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. The chairman correctly points out that illegal immigration has grown beyond a problem for states in the southwestern U.S. It has become a national security issue, and it is time for decisive action.

"Prior to September 11, 2001, illegal immigration was considered a regional issue without national implications," he said. "We quickly learned on that day that this is a national issue, affecting each and every American." While security efforts have increased in recent months, hundreds of people cross the U.S.-Mexico border illegally each day. This is a vulnerability that could be exploited by Al Qaeda operatives or other terrorist groups seeking entry into the U.S.

Illegal immigration is also having an impact on state and local governments and in communities all across the country. This growing influx is putting a financial burden on schools, our health care system, and delivery of other basic services.

FENCE FROM PACIFIC TO THE GULF

The bill's most noteworthy provision is creation of a border security zone which would run from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico. It would include the states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas in a plan to utilize "fencing, roads, and technology infrastructure" to secure the border from illegal crossings. It would be accompanied by addition of 25 new entry points to accommodate legal cross-border traffic.

While critics of the fence idea argue it would be costly, Chairman Hunter explains that the expense is only a fraction of the burden American taxpayers are shouldering for an estimated 11 million people in the country illegally today. The plan faces opposition from liberal political groups within the U.S., and from environmentalists, but support for the fence is growing. It is hard to deny the effectiveness of such a barrier. Federal authorities report that illegal entries have decreased dramatically in the areas where fencing has been used.

MORE AGENTS, MORE ENFORCEMENT

The legislation would authorize 10,000 new border patrol agents and 1,250 new investigators. It would create an Assistant Attorney General for Immigration Enforcement to focus on apprehension and deportation activities. These efforts include speeding court action against suspected illegals, alien smuggling/trafficking enforcement, and more emphasis on sanctions against employers who hire illegal workers.

The employer-sanction provisions are an essential element of any reform effort because they eliminate financial incentives that motivate many workers to come to the U.S. illegally.

The problem of illegal immigration is admittedly complex. If answers were easy, this would have been accomplished long ago. But any solution clearly begins with a secure border. I look forward to the debate on the bold idea of a security fence and the accompanying enforcement provisions. The outcome will reveal how seriously we view the problem of illegal immigration.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; congress; illegalimmagration; immagration; immigrantlist; mississippi; rogerwicker; wicker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
I was going to respond to my rep concerning todays speech by President Bush and came across this.
1 posted on 11/28/2005 6:00:11 PM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; A CA Guy; ...

ping


2 posted on 11/28/2005 6:00:57 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Missipp ping!


3 posted on 11/28/2005 6:01:29 PM PST by Sybeck1 (chance is the “magic wand to make not only rabbits but entire universes appear out of nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar; Borax Queen
While critics of the fence idea argue it would be costly, Chairman Hunter explains that the expense is only a fraction of the burden American taxpayers are shouldering for an estimated 11 million people in the country illegally today.

ping

4 posted on 11/28/2005 6:01:39 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Itzlzha; Stellar Dendrite

ping


6 posted on 11/28/2005 6:02:51 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
"The problem of illegal immigration is admittedly complex"

It's only complex because Congress makes it so.

7 posted on 11/28/2005 6:03:21 PM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

first Mexican customs facility in the United States
http://www.insidebayarea.com/businessnews/ci_3254225 ^ | 11/27/2005 | Garance Burke


Posted on 11/27/2005 4:42:00 PM PST by cope85


New Kansas City customs port may expedite trade with Mexico Region hopes to capitalize on growing cross-border trade By Garance Burke, Associated Press

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Shipping American cars and electronics to Mexico may become much cheaper and faster early next year when the first Mexican customs facility in the United States is expected to open in the heart of the Midwest. It may be nearly 1,000 miles to the border from Kansas City, but this industrial hub will soon start building an inland port that would whisk thousands of trucks through export inspections and shoot them back out onto the North American Free Trade Agreement corridor, where they can roll through the border without further delays.

The $3 million facility, which would be the first foreign customs office inside the United States, will likely be approved by the U.S. and Mexican governments by year's end and is scheduled to open next May, said Chris Gutierrez, president of Kansas City SmartPort Inc., a nonprofit organization promoting the project.

Planners say manufacturing industries in the upper Midwest and Canada would be the first to benefit from the new customs operation, which they believe could expand to handle cargo from across the country.

Mexican government officials confirmed the two countries had agreed on the overall proposal, though both nations said finer points of the agreement were still being negotiated by customs officials — including security concerns and the legal standing of Mexican customs officials working in the United States.

After a visit to Kansas City in May, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Robert C. Bonner said the pilot proposal was "bold and imaginative" and could transform Kansas City into a "major new trade link" that would fit well with new border security initiatives to pre-approve cargo.

"We've always had the railroad and the river and the airlines and the roads, but this will open up tremendous new business opportunities for Kansas City," said Kansas City councilwoman Bonnie Sue Cooper, who said she proposed the idea to the Mexican Finance Minister Francisco Gil Diaz last year.

In the 1940s, Kansas City — at the intersection of two major interstate highways along the Missouri River — was one of the country's largest rail distribution centers.

Now plans are to fill a gravel lot that once held cattle with a big-box building that will process long lines of big rigs packed with goods for export to Mexico.

Providing the containers stay electronically sealed once they're inspected, the trucks will be free to cross the border and avoid further inspections, resulting in efficiencies and cost savings.

"Kansas City is the geographical

heart of the United States and of the entire NAFTA region," said Everardo Suarez, Mexican consul general in Kansas City. Once the agreement is completed, Kansas City would essentially function like a Mexican port.

The transition to the global economy comes just in time: since the city's stockyards and airline industry declined, it has been struggling to rebuild itself as a leader in global logistics.

"I think this project would go a long way to transform trucking," said Chaz Jones, a research analyst with Morgan Keegan, a Memphis investment bank. "Truckers typically get paid per mile. The more time cargo spends moving on the road, the more revenue it generates for a carrier."

In recent months, delays at the hurricane-damaged port of New Orleans and bottlenecks at Long Beach and Los Angeles have caused companies to look for alternative trade routes. Industry analysts said Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is one of several companies moving freight through Mexico as an alternative to using West Coast ports; Wal-Mart spokespeople would not confirm the move.

Because so much trade between NAFTA partners is carried by truck, Midwestern cities with good transportation infrastructure stand to capture some of that trade flow.

In August 2005, trucks carried 64 percent of imports from Canada and Mexico and 80 percent of U.S. exports to those countries, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

San Antonio has also invested significant efforts to develop a competing inland port. But Kansas City officials hope the customs facility will give the city a leg up, especially once the project's second phase, which will allow rail cars to clear Mexican customs as well, is completed.

Kansas City Southern owns two Mexican train lines which means they can send freight from the Midwest directly to the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, where car manufacturer Mazda Motor Corp. has begun shipping vehicles from Japan to Kansas City.

"There might not be enough volume to open a rail facility today, but we certainly expect that will increase in the next few years," said Warren Erdman, a vice president at Kansas City Southern. "We have great interest in the proposal."


8 posted on 11/28/2005 6:03:37 PM PST by cope85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

You go Congressman Roger F. Wicker! A Guy with balls and brains is exactly what we need. Pay attention GWB.


9 posted on 11/28/2005 6:04:34 PM PST by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

A fence will work and could save this country billions in the long run.


10 posted on 11/28/2005 6:04:45 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
We can't possibly build a wall.

It can't be done.

It's too expensive.

The border is too long.

We can't build it with our meager with our modern machinery, technology, and pre-fabrication capabilities. It's beyond our abilities now.

Nope, can't be done.
11 posted on 11/28/2005 6:05:24 PM PST by flashbunny (To err is human. But to really screw something up, have the government try to fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

We have the momentum, now we must see it through. Weeks ago, people scoffed at the idea of a wall/fence at the border. Now the politicians in Washington are feeling the heat, and we're getting close. We need an Israeli style wall as soon as possible, and we need a huge enforcement effort far beyond anything being contemplated now to see this through. Keep up the good work, folks; we're being heard.


12 posted on 11/28/2005 6:05:39 PM PST by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
IMHO the PUBS are playing right into the RATS hands. Remember prop. 187 in CA.? As soon as the PUBS vote for a fence, the RATS will declare it racist, a judge will decide its unconstitutional and the PUBS will lose the burgeoning Hispanic vote, just like CA.
13 posted on 11/28/2005 6:07:18 PM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get out of the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
This country needs a "Border Party"
All of the congressional districts that are border districts
need to unify under a coalition that has only 1 issue, border security.
14 posted on 11/28/2005 6:07:42 PM PST by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

That's just a risk we'll have to take.


15 posted on 11/28/2005 6:08:03 PM PST by the anti-liberal (Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Good for Hunter, but that figure on illegal aliens appears about 9M low.


16 posted on 11/28/2005 6:08:25 PM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
A fence will work and could save this country billions in the long run.

Not if it's a wicker fence.

17 posted on 11/28/2005 6:08:35 PM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Whoa! Is it doable?


18 posted on 11/28/2005 6:08:45 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar

I was thinking that was a very low ball park figure; but I applaud what he wants to do.


19 posted on 11/28/2005 6:10:09 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Yeah.

The great wall of China was a complete waste of time. (s)

The Israeli wall is a waste as well. (more s)


20 posted on 11/28/2005 6:10:45 PM PST by HonestConservative (Bless our Servicemen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson