Skip to comments.
AMERICA ON TRIAL IN IRAQ (Ramsey Clark)
The Omegaletter ^
| Nov 28,2005
| Jack Kinsella
Posted on 11/28/2005 1:19:26 PM PST by txgirl4Bush
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: txgirl4Bush
403 - 3
2
posted on
11/28/2005 1:20:12 PM PST
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
To: txgirl4Bush
I saw this idiot on television this morning. When's he going to stand trial, or at least have a sanity hearing?
3
posted on
11/28/2005 1:21:22 PM PST
by
Spok
(Est omnis de civilitate.)
To: txgirl4Bush
The good news here is that Ramsey may finally get his. Saddam will realize that if his lawyer dies, he gets a continuance next time he's in court. Wouldn't want to be one of his lawyers.
4
posted on
11/28/2005 1:22:56 PM PST
by
Dilbert56
5
posted on
11/28/2005 1:23:48 PM PST
by
Stellar Dendrite
(There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
To: Dilbert56
6
posted on
11/28/2005 1:24:06 PM PST
by
Stellar Dendrite
(There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
To: txgirl4Bush
To: txgirl4Bush
This man and his politics says all you need to know about the Carter administration and the drift of the Democratic party to the left. That such a man could obtain high office in Carter's cabinet and continue to retain the respect of current Democrats serves to prove the Democratic party is communist in all but name.
8
posted on
11/28/2005 1:25:41 PM PST
by
saganite
(The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
To: txgirl4Bush
Everyone knows what should be done. Hussein doesn't require a public trial whereby his overpaid, overzealous, American attorney gets a public platform to voice his anti-Americanism.
To: saganite
And this helps also:
A Must Read:
Unholy Alliance :
Radical Islam and the American Left (Hardcover)
by David Horowitz
**************************************
Vastly Illuminating, September 25, 2004
I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.
It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.
Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.
This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air.
<**************************************
To: Dilbert56
No. 4: Now wouldnt that be a crying shame.
Maybe the troops in Iraq could place him in a Humvee and have him drive around looking for IED's.
To: txgirl4Bush
Ramsey Clark - The face of the Democrat party.
To: txgirl4Bush
What is up with this Rat-****. Only in America do we have designated traitors , like Jimmy Carter,Kerry others who gleefully go about the business of undermining their own country for the benefit of our sworn relentless enemies while the rest of us sit on the sidelines with our thumb up our nose....
13
posted on
11/28/2005 1:33:36 PM PST
by
Calusa
(Say Nick, was ya ever stung by a dead bee?)
To: txgirl4Bush
Clark and others say a fair trial is impossible in Iraq because of the insurgency and because, they argue, the country is effectively under foreign military occupation. I guess none one at Nuremberg got a fair trial either, then?
14
posted on
11/28/2005 1:36:31 PM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: saganite
You can't blame this one on Jimmah - Clark was A-G in the Johnson administration, not Carter's.
15
posted on
11/28/2005 1:36:35 PM PST
by
Bubbatuck
(Demonrats: The End is Near!)
To: txgirl4Bush
Clark was the 2nd pick for Saddam.
Unfortunately for Saddam, Johnny Cochran already bit the big one.
16
posted on
11/28/2005 1:39:50 PM PST
by
Paloma_55
(Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
To: txgirl4Bush
Ramsey Clark - LBJ's most enduring legacy....
To: Dilbert56
Ramsey may finally get his. Indeed! Send him into the belly of the beast, immediately!
18
posted on
11/28/2005 1:40:50 PM PST
by
ArmyTeach
(Pray daily for our troops...)
To: Stellar Dendrite
"what a commie POS."
Yep. Agree totally.
To: txgirl4Bush
The article fails to mention that Clark was completely unqualified for the job of Attorney General.
He was given the post because LBJ wanted Clark's father, Supreme Court Justice Tom Clark, to step down so he could appoint Thurgood Marshall to the court.
Clark agreed to step down only on the condition that his son be promoted to Attorney General.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson