Then we could have DISCOVERY, in which I would suggest the following questions be asked:
Please tell us, Mr. Wilson, where you got the money for your million dollar house, your kitchen remodel with granite countertops, your Rollex, your Persian rugs, your Jaguar, your Mercedes, etc.
How recently have you had contact with your second wife, Jacqueline? What was her position with the French intelligence agency?
How much were you paid by the Kerry campaign, and was it their idea to change the findings you made on your Niger trip?
What contacts have you had with Sandy Berger?
Describe in detail your business and personal relationship with Walter Pincus of the Washington Post.
Why did you not sign a confidentiality agreement with the CIA? Who approved your non-signing?
I could go on, but you get my point. I don't think he will sue, because even I, a midwestern housewife, can think of a great many questions which the government's attorneys should ask.
I have a hard time believing Wilson would be stupid enough to put himself in the position of having to testify under oath in open court. Unless, of course, he's gotten to the point where he actually believes his own lies, and is confident that the media are totally on his side and will continue to spin everything in his favor, as they've done throughout this whole farce.
This speaks volumes about the CIA vetting process. The MSM would have us believe Valerie was Jane Bond. They would also have us believe the Agency would allow her to remain a NOC after announcing her marriage to a guy who was already married twice, one of whom was a friggin' French agent! This whole story pi**es me off. The time and money wasted on a buffoon like Wilson should be charged with interest back to him. He could pay it back with the money he made on uranium deals in the 90's..