Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mym

From what I've read, another major difference between Shuttle and Buran was that the Buran could fly remotely.

The Shuttle must be manned to take off and land.


6 posted on 11/28/2005 11:22:23 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow

The ONLY flight of the system was unmanned.

With all their experience in long-term space habitation, they couldn't copy the US life support system as well. Sad.


8 posted on 11/28/2005 11:26:13 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
From what I've read, another major difference between Shuttle and Buran was that the Buran could fly remotely.

That, and the capacity to carry several extra crew members. I'm guessing they would have been "political officers" who could make sure the Buran was piloted to a landing on the correct runway, so to speak.

(steely)

11 posted on 11/28/2005 11:29:38 AM PST by Steely Tom (Fortunately, the Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
The Shuttle must be manned to take off and land.

IIRC, the Shuttle can do both autonomously. (Indeed, it takes off autonomously every single launch.) Autoland capability exists as well. The astronauts, however, are naturally reticent to allow it.

21 posted on 11/28/2005 11:45:09 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson