Behe wasn't functioning as a scientist when he formulated his ID theories...there's not a bit of science in ID.
Actually science welcomes critiques that are meaningful and generated by data derived via the scientific method. In fact, that is exactly the way science progresses.
ID is actually sophistry.
>>>Behe wasn't functioning as a scientist when he formulated his ID theories...there's not a bit of science in ID.<<<
You mean, there is no Math in Behe's theories, don't you?