Wrong. In fact, very wrong. You'd think people would know by now how how false this statement is. Yet people keep claiming it, in willful disregard for the truth.
"Wrong. In fact, very wrong. You'd think people would know by now how how false this statement is. Yet people keep claiming it, in willful disregard for the truth."
I will research these references further as the statements made do not provide any detail for the argument.
However, at first glance, none of the examples made with these references show where a species became something else. There only appear to several examples of variations of subspecies which are expected within a given gene pool.
I maintain that Lizards do no grow feathers because they 'need them' and complex life does not develop from simple life to 'adapt' as is maintained by the Evolution community. Any argument to define this outright speculation as 'science' is absurd.
>>>Wrong. In fact, very wrong. You'd think people would know by now how how false this statement is. Yet people keep claiming it, in willful disregard for the truth.<<<
That is quite a stretch to claim those meager papers -- even if not fabricated -- prove the theory of evolution.