[garybob]

Evolution has been tested many, many times, and has held up.

Assertions are not evidence. If you are referring to the computer models some claim as evidence, those are as bogus as the global warming computer models.

For evolution to be held up, you have to start with a state of perfect nothingness. Otherwise, where is your starting point to replicate evolution?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"For evolution to be held up, you have to start with a state of perfect nothingness. Otherwise, where is your starting point to replicate evolution?"

You're not under the mistaken view that evolution has EVER had anything to do with the origins of matter, are you? It doesn't. Nor has it ever been concerned with the origins of life (that would be abiogenesis). It deals only with existing life that is imperfectly self-replicating.

[Right Wing Professor]

If you are referring to the computer models some claim as evidence, those are as bogus as the global warming computer models.

I am not, as you would know if you had read the thread before posting.

Is it too much to ask that people use the View Replies feature John Robinson has gone to the trouble of providing for us?

For evolution to be held up, you have to start with a state of perfect nothingness. Otherwise, where is your starting point to replicate evolution?

Evolution is about how organisms change from generation to generation. It has nothing to do with nothingness.

[whattajoke]

For evolution to be held up, you have to start with a state of perfect nothingness. Otherwise, where is your starting point to replicate evolution?

Um, how about Christian God? Believe it now?