Read the post a little more carefully. That is from a link that was sent to me in a previous post, so I researched the link, had a major attack of laughter, and posted it for all to enjoy.
It is certainly not something I would support. I am following the evidence, and that currently points to evolution.
Read Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals where he was the first to set out categories of judgment (analytic and synthetic) along with their epistemological restrictions, (Contingent Knowledge vs Knowledge based on the examination of first principles).
He also posited a third category: of synthetic a priori judgments that still dog philosophy to this day.
We are actually on the same page. IDers make the assertion that EVOs stand on A Priori claims but claims base on observation can never be A Priori