[Dimensio]

As I said there is no conclusive proof in either direction.

Of course. When a creationist has no supporting evidence for his or her claim, it's still somehow not dishonest to present it as established fact.

[BushCountry]

I never said that it was an established fact. He was the one that said the story was a complete lie. It wasn't, in fact, the women existed and most likely visited Darwin. Both sides have no conclusive evidence either way.

The one fact you and he avoided was that Darwin considered himself a "Theist" even after turning away from the literal interpretation of the Bible. That he believe that God created life and was one of the first IDers.