Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

This idea that certain classes of specially-anointed citizens have more access to basic Constitutional Rights strikes me as extremely dangerous.

We've seen this for years with the 2nd Amendment, where special rights accrue to police, politicians, and the politically connected.

Now we're seeing it with the 1st.

It's time to really, really push back.


42 posted on 11/28/2005 2:20:03 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomPoster
"This idea that certain classes of specially-anointed citizens have more access to basic Constitutional Rights strikes me as extremely dangerous."

Excellent point. It bears repeating.

58 posted on 11/28/2005 5:35:46 AM PST by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomPoster
This idea that certain classes of specially-anointed citizens have more access to basic Constitutional Rights strikes me as extremely dangerous.

Agree. . .this should be more than a 'wake-up' call. And equally dangerous, as the 'specially-anointed' is the reality that they are first, 'self-annointed'. . .

60 posted on 11/28/2005 5:41:40 AM PST by cricket (No Freedom - No Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson