To: Jim Robinson
This idea that certain classes of specially-anointed citizens have more access to basic Constitutional Rights strikes me as extremely dangerous.
We've seen this for years with the 2nd Amendment, where special rights accrue to police, politicians, and the politically connected.
Now we're seeing it with the 1st.
It's time to really, really push back.
42 posted on
11/28/2005 2:20:03 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: FreedomPoster
"This idea that certain classes of specially-anointed citizens have more access to basic Constitutional Rights strikes me as extremely dangerous."
Excellent point. It bears repeating.
To: FreedomPoster
This idea that certain classes of specially-anointed citizens have more access to basic Constitutional Rights strikes me as extremely dangerous. Agree. . .this should be more than a 'wake-up' call. And equally dangerous, as the 'specially-anointed' is the reality that they are first, 'self-annointed'. . .
60 posted on
11/28/2005 5:41:40 AM PST by
cricket
(No Freedom - No Peace)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson