[peyton randolph]

You came on this thread in living color showing every intent to disrupt.

Yes. That is why the first two words I wrote were "Right Message." You just got your panties twisted because the next two words were "Wrong Messenger." Tancredo can't win a national election. What part of this do you not understand? Better to push the immigration issue with those who can and will be elected to higher office than to hook one's wagon to a guy who will do worse at the polls than Buchanan did in '00.

[inquest]

You really want to know what makes you belong on DU? It's not that you don't like Tancredo. It's that you sit there and make unsubstantiated claims, just like the Democrats do. They know that all they have to do is repeat the allegation often enough without making the slightest attempt to support any of it, and the MSM will run with it.

[webheart]

Better to push the immigration issue with those who can and will be elected to higher office than to hook one's wagon to a guy who will do worse at the polls than Buchanan did in '00.

And just whom do you propose that I support? There isn't anyone. Tom Tancredo is the only one who will try to make a difference. Establishment Republicans have too much fear of the press to take any controversial stance. So either you can support someone who you think might possibly at some point or another, hopefully, take a position that could be construed as a stand, or you can support someone who takes a stand. I am with Tom if he decides to run. You can take Hillary if you want.