In my Iraqi WMD blog I list the accumulated evidence for an ongoing WMD effort during Saddam's regime.
1 posted on
11/27/2005 2:42:50 PM PST by
leebert
To: leebert
The most convincing objection to the Niger Uranium theory is based in simple logic. Iraq had a large amount of unused Uranium which had been left in the country when the UN weapons inspectors pulled out. Why negotiate to buy something they had plenty of?
2 posted on
11/27/2005 2:52:43 PM PST by
Canard
To: leebert
Got info on the Al Samoud 2 missle ?
3 posted on
11/27/2005 2:53:40 PM PST by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
To: leebert
4 posted on
11/27/2005 2:54:47 PM PST by
AliVeritas
(''I'd rather have Jihadis in front of me than Democrats behind me.'' Go GOP!)
To: leebert
Now maybe you can convince the president, vice president, secretaries of state and defense, because they all say the intel was screwed up.
5 posted on
11/27/2005 3:01:21 PM PST by
Huck
(Yeah.)
To: leebert
6 posted on
11/27/2005 3:02:01 PM PST by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
To: leebert
The Left would ignore conclusive proof of Saddam's possession of WMDs just as the OJ jury would have ignored a video tape of OJ hacking away.
8 posted on
11/27/2005 3:23:51 PM PST by
luvbach1
(Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
To: leebert
I went to the posted website. It looks like it has good information. However, starting with "Niger's Uranium," some of the text seems to overlay existing text. Anyone else have this problem? If so, the web-page designer needs to work on the problem.
9 posted on
11/27/2005 3:31:58 PM PST by
ChessExpert
(Democrats: Sore/Losermen 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012)
To: leebert
Thanks for the tip leebert, I ordered both dvds.
10 posted on
11/27/2005 3:43:35 PM PST by
Randy Larsen
(I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson