To: It's me
So, you are saying thatr it is ok that the settlers cut down and uprooted the trees? No, I am saying that the "settlers" DID NOT CUT DOWN or UPROOT any trees.
Look at the pictures on Yahoo. When you find a picture of a CUT DOWN or UPROOTED tree, post it here.
20 posted on
11/27/2005 12:53:12 PM PST by
Alouette
(Gaza: Too small to be a country, too large to be an insane asylum (thanx: Pettigru).)
To: Alouette
Can I ask why they did it?
22 posted on
11/27/2005 12:58:10 PM PST by
It's me
To: Alouette
So the police don't know the difference?
70 posted on
11/27/2005 2:12:38 PM PST by
notigar
To: Alouette
No, I am saying that the "settlers" DID NOT CUT DOWN or UPROOT any trees. Here's my point of curiousity: who owned the trees, and whose property was it?
If they were Palestinian trees, why were the settlers touching them (for needed pruning or not)?
159 posted on
11/27/2005 5:30:58 PM PST by
SauronOfMordor
(A planned society is most appealing to those with the conceit to think they will be the planners)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson