Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: It's me

Is that right? I read one year, but the information wasn't directly from Singer so it may have been wrong.


70 posted on 11/27/2005 12:47:14 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero; Inkie
This article first appeared in the Volume 23 / Number 3 issue of the Christian Research Journal. For further information or to subscribe to the Christian Research Journal go to: http://www.equip.org/publ/

In 1993, ethicist Peter Singer shocked many Americans by suggesting that no newborn should be considered a person until 30 days after birth and that the attending physician should kill some disabled babies on the spot. Five years later, his appointment as Decamp Professor of Bio-Ethics at Princeton University ignited a firestorm of controversy, though his ideas about abortion and infanticide were hardly new. In 1979 he wrote, “Human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons”; therefore, “the life of a newborn is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee.”1

82 posted on 11/27/2005 1:11:32 PM PST by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson