Au contraire, I said payback was a bitch. The unionist's sowed the wind, at Lawrence, they reaped the whirlwind from a desperately wounded adversary.
So any massacre of rebels supporters would be justified in your eyes because of Lawrence? Why not admit it was tit for tat throughout the war? You can justify murdering innocent Unionists and admit that the murder of innocent southern supporters was equally justifiable. Does that sum up your position?