> If it is something they see as a 'good'...
Who says libertarians would see it as a "good?" I wouldn't want a female - or male, for that matter - relative of mine to work on a Democratic staff or as a lawyer. Both of these are substantially lower than the lowest prostitute, IMO. But I would not make lawyering illegal.
Just *reeeeaaalllly* regulated...
To make a vice legal is to endorse it as a 'good' thing (legal) as opposed to a 'bad' thing (illegal). The libertine claims that sex on demand or for money is a form of 'liberty' and therefore ought to be legal.
Even know I have been a Libertarian for years, I can no longer be in the Party. The Libertarian party is omitting important information in order to make their point.