To: mvpel
"Free and unregulated" doesn't mean "completely immune from devastating liability lawsuits." In China? He, he. No, in order to compete we have to adopt Chinese standards. The price of free trade.
38 posted on
11/26/2005 7:52:05 PM PST by
A. Pole
(Gov.Gumpas:"But that would be putting the clock back, have you no idea of progress, of development?")
To: A. Pole
I think you missed my point - you slander the idea of "free and unregulated market" by using China as example of the concept.
If those individuals damaged by the actions of a business are not permitted to sue the crap out of said business to recover their losses, then that's not a "free market," it's "crony capitalism."
39 posted on
11/26/2005 7:58:24 PM PST by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: A. Pole
No, in order to compete we have to adopt Chinese standards. The price of free trade. Surely there is a looser cause somewhere you do not back. Statisticly people like you must exist, I just never thought that the Gene pool could be so mean.
43 posted on
11/28/2005 1:42:33 AM PST by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson